Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20127498›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2010

Targeting the bone microenvironment in multiple myeloma.

G David Roodman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Management of Myeloma Bone Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. TRPV2-induced CaCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of osteocytes in multiple myeloma bone disease.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2014
    Review
  19. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma.Advances in hematology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G David RoodmanDepartment of Medicine/Hematology-Oncology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA. Roodmangd@upmc.edu
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by the frequent development of osteolytic lesions, osteopenia, pathological fractures, and/or severe bone pain. In the past few years several potential factors involved in this process have been identified and, with the increased knowledge of the signaling pathways involved in the regulation of normal osteoblast and osteoclast function, have provided us with a better understanding of the contributions of the marrow microenvironment to MM bone disease. These studies have identified several potential novel targets for treating MM bone disease in addition to the current standard treatment of bisphosphonates. In this article, we discuss several potential targets for treating MM bone disease as well as novel therapies that are in clinical trials for these patients.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsBone and BonesBone DiseasesBone MarrowBone Marrow CellsBone ResorptionHumansMultiple MyelomaOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID20127498
OpenAlexW1982261178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.