Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20127204›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2011

Urinary biomarkers in lupus nephritis.

Joyce Reyes-Thomas, Irene Blanco, Chaim Putterman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The promising role and prognostic value of miR-198 in human diseases.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Management of Lupus Nephritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Acute skin exposure to ultraviolet light triggers neutrophil-mediated kidney inflammation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joyce Reyes-ThomasDivision of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Forchheimer Building, Room 701N, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA.
Irene Blanco
Chaim Putterman

Funding

The Renal Pathogenicity of anti-DNA AntibodiesR01AR048692 · NIAMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PUTTERMAN, CHAIM · 2002 to 2013
$4.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in the form of severe lupus nephritis is associated with a significant burden of morbidity and mortality. Conventional laboratory biomarkers in current use have not been very successful in anticipating disease flares, predicting renal histology, or decreasing unwanted outcomes. Since early treatment is associated with improved clinical results, it is thus essential to identify new biomarkers with substantial predictive power to reduce the serious sequelae of this difficult to control lupus manifestation. Indeed, considerable efforts and progress have been made over the last few years in the search for novel biomarkers. Since urinary biomarkers are more easily obtainable with much less risk to the patient than repeat renal biopsies, and these may more accurately discern between renal disease and other organ manifestations than their serum counterparts, there has been tremendous interest in studying new candidate urine biomarkers. Below, we review several promising urinary biomarkers under investigation, including total proteinuria and microalbuminuria, urinary proteomic signatures, and the individual inflammatory mediators interleukin-6, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, CXCL16, IP-10, and tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL16Chemokines, CXCCytokine TWEAKEarly DiagnosisHumansInterleukin-6Lupus NephritisMicePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProteinuriaProteomicsReceptors, ScavengerBiomarkersChemokine CXCL10Chemokine CXCL16Chemokines, CXCCXCL10 protein, humanCXCL16 protein, humanCytokine TWEAKInterleukin-6Receptors, ScavengerTNFSF12 protein, humanTumor Necrosis FactorsVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

PMID20127204
PMCPMC2917506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.