Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20127141›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2010

Transgene excision from wheat chromosomes by phage phiC31 integrase.

Katja Kempe, Myroslava Rubtsova, Carolin Berger, Jochen Kumlehn, Corinna Schollmeier, Mario Gils

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New applications for phage integrases.Journal of molecular biology · 2014
    Review
  6. Split-gene system for hybrid wheat seed production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katja KempeLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstr. 3, 06466, Gatersleben, Germany.
Myroslava Rubtsova
Carolin Berger
Jochen Kumlehn
Corinna Schollmeier
Mario Gils
Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Streptomyces phage phiC31 integrase was tested for its ability to excise transgenic DNA from the wheat genome by site-specific recombination. Plants that stably express phiC31 integrase were crossed to plants carrying a target construct bearing the phiC31 recognition sites, attP and attB. In the progeny, phiC31 recombinase mediates recombination between the att sites of the target locus, which results in excision of the intervening DNA. Recombination events could be identified in 34 independent wheat lines by PCR and Southern blot analysis and by sequencing of the excision footprints. Recombinant loci were inherited to the subsequent generation. The results presented here establish the integrase-att system as a tool for catalysing the precise elimination of DNA sequences from wheat chromosomes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantTransgenesBacteriophagesGenetic EngineeringHybridization, GeneticIntegrasesRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATriticumViral ProteinsIntegrasesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20127141
OpenAlexW2075401280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.