ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2010
Clinical practice: heart failure in children. Part II: current maintenance therapy and new therapeutic approaches.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between NT-proBNP changes and clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with heart failure: Insights from PANORAMA-HF and PARADIGM-HF.ESC heart failure · 2025Trial
- Survival Without Cardiac Transplantation Among Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2017Observational
- Experts' recommendations for the management of cardiogenic shock in children.Annals of intensive care · 2016Article
- From discrete dilated cardiomyopathy to successful cardiac transplantation in congenital disorders of glycosylation due to dolichol kinase deficiency (DK1-CDG).Heart failure reviews · 2013Article
- Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical characteristics and management of childhood cardiorenal syndrome.World journal of nephrology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current maintenance treatment for children with heart failure remains controversial: To a large extent, it is based on extrapolation of data derived from trials in adult populations. There are only a few randomized trials focused on the treatment of children with cardiac disease, especially in the subgroup with cardiomyopathy and heart failure. The goals of therapy are to maintain circulatory and end-organ function and to allow for recovery and reverse remodeling to occur. When maintenance therapy fails and medical treatment does not result in clinical improvement, the alternative of device therapy must be considered: In that case, the usual aim is to stabilize circulatory status, as a bridge to either recovery or to cardiac transplantation. Recently, carefully selected patients with electromechanical dyssynchrony of ventricular systolic function have demonstrated a benefit from biventricular pacing devices (cardiac resynchronization therapy), with improved functional capacity and quality of life and, in some patients, avoidance of the need for transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20127112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.