Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20127071›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2010

Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review of randomized studies.

Haris S Vasiliadis, Jason Wasiak, Georgia Salanti

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation after failed bone marrow stimulation leads to inferior clinical results.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Avascular necrosis complicating chondral resurfacing techniques.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Haris S VasiliadisDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, Ioannina, Greece. vasiliadismd@gmail.com
Jason Wasiak
Georgia Salanti
Monash University · AUSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

European Research Council 260559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) techniques are becoming more popular for the treatment of full thickness cartilage lesions of the knee joint. However, there is no systematic information for the efficacy of the new generation ACI techniques compared to other treatment options. A systematic review of the existing evidence from randomized clinical trials of ACI treatment would contribute to understanding the advantages and limitations of this method and would inform the planning of future studies. Using pre-defined criteria, we searched a number of electronic databases to identify all the existing randomized control trials of any type of ACI treatment. Risk of bias was assessed and an analysis of the reported outcomes was performed. Information on the clinical efficacy and safety of ACI compared to other interventions was collected and presented. Nine trials were identified with 626 patients. Patients ranged from 15 to 52 years, and the size of treated lesions was between 1 and 22 cm(2). ACI was associated with improvement in clinical outcomes compared to baseline. However, the body of evidence did not suggest any superiority of ACI over other treatments. Complication rates were comparable between interventions except from an increased rate of graft hypertrophies after ACI with periosteum. ACI is an effective treatment for full thickness chondral defects of the knee, providing an improvement of clinical outcomes. However, there is insufficient data to say whether ACI is superior to other treatment strategies. More high quality studies and harmonization in the reported outcomes are needed before specific suggestions for practice can be made.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularChondrocytesHumansOrthopedic ProceduresOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID20127071
OpenAlexW1965943040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.