Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20126960›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2010

Follow-up for Alzheimer patients: European Alzheimer Disease Consortium position paper.

F Nourhashémi, M G Olde Rikkert, A Burns, B Winblad, G B Frisoni, J Fitten, B Vellas

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

F NourhashémiGérontopôle, Hôpitaux de Toulouse, France. nourhashemi.f@chu-toulouse.fr
M G Olde Rikkert
A Burns
B Winblad
G B Frisoni
J Fitten
B Vellas
Médipole Garonne · FRCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITKarolinska Institutet · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Manchester · GBVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlzheimer disease (AD) is one of the leading causes of dependence in the elderly. Providing care for patients with AD is complex and the type of care required depends on the stage of the disease and varies over time. The aim of this article is to discuss available care strategies once the AD diagnosis has been made and to propose a follow-up plan as standard of care at a European level.

methodsThe proposals developed in this article stem from the collaborative work of a panel of multidisciplinary experts involved in the care of AD patients (European Alzheimer Disease Consortium) based on the results of published scientific studies and on their experience from clinical practice.

conclusionSuggestions for follow-up frequency and easily administered and scored assessment tools are provided, thereby increasing efficiency and quality of care for patients with Alzheimer disease.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentHealth StatusQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCentral Nervous System AgentsDisease ProgressionEuropeFollow-Up StudiesHumansQuality of LifeCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID20126960
PMCPMC12878688
OpenAlexW2018738647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.