Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20124026›Full record

ArticleGenetics2010

Patterns of neutral genetic variation on recombining sex chromosomes.

Mark Kirkpatrick, Rafael F Guerrero, Samuel V Scarpino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Searching for signatures of sexually antagonistic selection on stickleback sex chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sex-biased gene expression at homomorphic sex chromosomes in emus and its implication for sex chromosome evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  20. Sequencing papaya X and Yh chromosomes reveals molecular basis of incipient sex chromosome evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark KirkpatrickSection of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. kirkp@mail.utexas.edu
Rafael F Guerrero
Samuel V Scarpino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals and plants have sex chromosomes that recombine over much of their length. Here we develop coalescent models for neutral sites on these chromosomes. The emphasis is on expected coalescence times (proportional to the expected amount of neutral genetic polymorphism), but we also derive some results for linkage disequilibria between neutral sites. We analyze the standard neutral model, a model with polymorphic Y chromosomes under balancing selection, and the invasion of a neo-Y chromosome. The results may be useful for testing hypotheses regarding how new sex chromosomes originate and how selection acts upon them.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetic VariationMaleMutationPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID20124026
PMCPMC2865914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.