Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20123800›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2010

The effect of helmets on the risk of head and neck injuries among skiers and snowboarders: a meta-analysis.

Kelly Russell, Josh Christie, Brent E Hagel

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving Spatial Hearing when Wearing Ski Helmets in Order to Increase Safety on Ski Slopes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. The Influence of Protective Headgear on the Visual Field of Recreational-Level Skiers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Ski-geometric parameters do not differ between ACL injury mechanisms in recreational alpine skiing.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In recreational alpine skiing, the ACL is predominantly injured in all knee injuries needing hospitalisation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly RussellDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Josh Christie
Brent E Hagel

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevention of head injuries in alpine activities has focused on helmets. However, no systematic review has examined the effect of helmets on head and neck injuries among skiers and snowboarders.

methodsWe searched electronic databases, conference proceedings and reference lists using a combination of the key words "head injury or head trauma," "helmet" and "skiing or snowboarding." We included studies that used a control group; compared skiers or snowboarders with and without helmets; and measured at least one objectively quantified outcome (e.g., head injury, and neck or cervical injury).

resultsWe included 10 case-control, 1 case-control/case-crossover and 1 cohort study in our analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) indicated that skiers and snowboarders with a helmet were significantly less likely than those without a helmet to have a head injury (OR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.79). The result was similar for studies that used controls without an injury (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-0.92), those that used controls with an injury other than a head or neck injury (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.80) and studies that included children under the age of 13 years (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.59). Helmets were not associated with an increased risk of neck injury (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72-1.09).

interpretationOur findings show that helmets reduce the risk of head injury among skiers and snowboarders with no evidence of an increased risk of neck injury.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCraniocerebral TraumaFemaleHead Protective DevicesHumansMaleNeck InjuriesRisk FactorsSkiingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20123800
PMCPMC2831705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.