Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20123134›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2010

Structural diversity of the Y-family DNA polymerases.

Janice D Pata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Natural history of eukaryotic DNA viruses with double jelly-roll major capsid proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanism Underlying the Bypass of Apurinic/Pyrimidinic Site Analogs byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Beyond the Lesion: Back to High Fidelity DNA Synthesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Mammalian DNA Polymerase Kappa Activity and Specificity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Ribonucleotide discrimination by translesion synthesis DNA polymerases.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janice D PataWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201, USA. jpata@wadsworth.org
Albany State University · US

Funding

Structural and Mechanistic Studies of Error-Prone PolymerasesR01GM080573 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI PATA, JANICE D · 2008 to 2018
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM080573NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Y-family translesion DNA polymerases enable cells to tolerate many forms of DNA damage, yet these enzymes have the potential to create genetic mutations at high rates. Although this polymerase family was defined less than a decade ago, more than 90 structures have already been determined so far. These structures show that the individual family members bypass damage and replicate DNA with either error-free or mutagenic outcomes, depending on the polymerase, the lesion and the sequence context. Here, these structures are reviewed and implications for polymerase function are discussed.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA RepairEukaryotaHumansProkaryotic CellsDNADNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID20123134
PMCPMC2846201
OpenAlexW2006357154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.