ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2010
Coagulation profiling of random-source cats.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chemistry and hemostatic parameters of class B vendor cats (Felis catus) can show wide levels of variation, possibly because of initial health status. We compared prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, common pathway assay and thrombin time between Class B vendor cats (n = 30) and a control group of healthy cats (n = 16). The antiprotease activities of antiXa, antiIIa, heparin cofactor II, and antithrombin were measured also. Plasma samples from citrated blood were analyzed by using standard clotting assays and commercially available chromogenic substrate assays. Tests for homogeneity of variances and 1-way ANOVA were used to test for significant differences between groups. Results of ANOVA were highly significant between groups for heparin cofactor II and Heptest activity levels. Variances were significantly different between groups for prothrombin time; therefore, an ANOVA was not done. These studies suggest that the class B cats exhibited sufficiently wide variations in their coagulation parameters that they may not be optimal subjects for vascular or cardiovascular research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20122312PMC2824963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.