Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20122262›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Comparative genomic and proteomic analyses of two Mycoplasma agalactiae strains: clues to the macro- and micro-events that are shaping mycoplasma diversity.

Laurent X Nouvel, Pascal Sirand-Pugnet, Marc S Marenda, Eveline Sagné, Valérie Barbe, Sophie Mangenot, Chantal Schenowitz, Daniel Jacob, Aurélien Barré, Stéphane Claverol and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bacterial conjugation in the ruminant pathogenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impacts ofMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent X NouvelUniversité de Toulouse, ENVT, UMR 1225 Interactions Hôtes - Agents Pathogènes, 31076 Toulouse, France.
Pascal Sirand-Pugnet
Marc S Marenda
Eveline Sagné
Valérie Barbe
Sophie Mangenot
Chantal Schenowitz
Daniel Jacob
Aurélien Barré
Stéphane Claverol
Alain Blanchard
Christine Citti
Université de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Toulouse · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRBiologie du Fruit et Pathologie · FRGenoscope · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the genomic era is accumulating a tremendous amount of data, the question of how genomics can describe a bacterial species remains to be fully addressed. The recent sequencing of the genome of the Mycoplasma agalactiae type strain has challenged our general view on mycoplasmas by suggesting that these simple bacteria are able to exchange significant amount of genetic material via horizontal gene transfer. Yet, events that are shaping mycoplasma genomes and that are underlining diversity within this species have to be fully evaluated. For this purpose, we compared two strains that are representative of the genetic spectrum encountered in this species: the type strain PG2 which genome is already available and a field strain, 5632, which was fully sequenced and annotated in this study.

resultsThe two genomes differ by ca. 130 kbp with that of 5632 being the largest (1006 kbp). The make up of this additional genetic material mainly corresponds (i) to mobile genetic elements and (ii) to expanded repertoire of gene families that encode putative surface proteins and display features of highly-variable systems. More specifically, three entire copies of a previously described integrative conjugative element are found in 5632 that accounts for ca. 80 kbp. Other mobile genetic elements, found in 5632 but not in PG2, are the more classical insertion sequences which are related to those found in two other ruminant pathogens, M. bovis and M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC. In 5632, repertoires of gene families encoding surface proteins are larger due to gene duplication. Comparative proteomic analyses of the two strains indicate that the additional coding capacity of 5632 affects the overall architecture of the surface and suggests the occurrence of new phase variable systems based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.

conclusionOverall, comparative analyses of two M. agalactiae strains revealed a very dynamic genome which structure has been shaped by gene flow among ruminant mycoplasmas and expansion-reduction of gene repertoires encoding surface proteins, the expression of which is driven by localized genetic micro-events.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationEvolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA, BacterialGene FlowGene PoolGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyMutagenesis, InsertionalMycoplasma agalactiaePolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteomicsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20122262
PMCPMC2824730
OpenAlexW2150712541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.