Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20122165›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Transcriptional changes in response to X chromosome dosage in the mouse: implications for X inactivation and the molecular basis of Turner Syndrome.

Alexandra M Lopes, Paul S Burgoyne, Andrew Ojarikre, Julien Bauer, Carole A Sargent, António Amorim, Nabeel A Affara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genetics of Sex Differences in Immunity.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. A Review of Recent Developments in Turner Syndrome Research.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The mouse as a model of fundamental concepts related to Turner syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2019
    Review
  8. Reversal Learning Performance in the XYFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Gender and Sex Differences in Adipose Tissue.Current diabetes reports · 2018
    Review
  10. Epigenetics in Turner syndrome.Clinical epigenetics · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The importance of having two X chromosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra M LopesIPATIMUP, Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. alopes@ipatimup.pt
Paul S Burgoyne
Andrew Ojarikre
Julien Bauer
Carole A Sargent
António Amorim
Nabeel A Affara
University of Cambridge · GBIPO Porto · PT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 8/EGH16106Medical Research Council MC_U117532009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundX monosomic mice (39,XO) have a remarkably mild phenotype when compared to women with Turner syndrome (45,XO). The generally accepted hypothesis to explain this discrepancy is that the number of genes on the mouse X chromosome which escape X inactivation, and thus are expressed at higher levels in females, is very small. However this hypothesis has never been tested and only a small number of genes have been assayed for their X-inactivation status in the mouse. We performed a global expression analysis in four somatic tissues (brain, liver, kidney and muscle) of adult 40,XX and 39,XO mice using the Illumina Mouse WG-6 v1_1 Expression BeadChip and an extensive validation by quantitative real time PCR, in order to identify which genes are expressed from both X chromosomes.

resultsWe identified several genes on the X chromosome which are overexpressed in XX females, including those previously reported as escaping X inactivation, as well as new candidates. However, the results obtained by microarray and qPCR were not fully concordant, illustrating the difficulty in ascertaining modest fold changes, such as those expected for genes escaping X inactivation. Remarkably, considerable variation was observed between tissues, suggesting that inactivation patterns may be tissue-dependent. Our analysis also exposed several autosomal genes involved in mitochondrial metabolism and in protein translation which are differentially expressed between XX and XO mice, revealing secondary transcriptional changes to the alteration in X chromosome dosage.

conclusionsOur results support the prediction that the mouse inactive X chromosome is largely silent, while providing a list of the genes potentially escaping X inactivation in rodents. Although the lower expression of X-linked genes in XO mice may not be relevant in the particular tissues/systems which are affected in human X chromosome monosomy, genes deregulated in XO mice are good candidates for further study in an involvement in Turner Syndrome phenotype.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingX Chromosome InactivationAllelesAnimalsFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, X-LinkedMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTranscription, GeneticTurner SyndromeX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID20122165
PMCPMC2837040
OpenAlexW2138879539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.