ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2010
Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods.
Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 347 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Study of the Effect of Snacks on Appetite Control
A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Study of the Effect of Certain Breakfasts on Appetite Control.
Evaluation of Glycemic Index Glycemic Load and Insulinemic Index of Spanish Breads and Their Effect on Incretins and Gastrointestinal Hormones Related With Appetite Regulation
The Effect of Breakfast Test Products on Acute Satiety Scores in Different Test Conditions
Physiological and Psychological Effects of Testosterone During Severe Energy Deficit and Recovery: a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial
A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial Examining the Effect of Peas in Muffins on Post-prandial Glycaemic Response and Satiety in Healthy Adults.
A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial Examining the Effect of Peas in Chili on Post-prandial Glycaemic Response and Satiety in Healthy Adults.
A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial Examining the Effect of Yellow Pea Flour in Bread on Post-prandial Glycaemic Response in Healthy Adults
The Effect of Repetitive Intake of Lipids in Alginate Gel on Food Intake and Satiety
Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Functional Gummies With Polydextrose Versus Placebo for Weight Control in Adults With Overweight or Obesity
Who cites it
347 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 987 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Cereal Fibers and Satiety: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Hyperphagia in rare melanocortin-4 receptor pathway diseases: therapeutic options and assessing treatment response.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of Chewing Gum on Satiety, Appetite Regulation, Energy Intake, and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of energy density on energy intake in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Downsizing food: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of reducing served food portion sizes on daily energy intake and body weight.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- The Effects of Food Advertisements on Food Intake and Neural Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Experimental Studies.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Pooled it
- Calorie reformulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of manipulating food energy density on daily energy intake.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Pooled it
- Parent-Child influences on child eating self-regulation and weight in early childhood: A systematic review.Appetite · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Whole Grain Intake, Compared with Refined Grain, on Appetite and Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Pooled it
- The Impact of Protein Supplementation on Appetite and Energy Intake in Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of viscous fiber supplementation on obesity indicators in individuals consuming calorie-restricted diets: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses to Food Cues: A Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Pooled it
- Food texture influences on satiety: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Pooled it
- Appetite-Suppressing and Satiety-Increasing Bioactive Phytochemicals: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2019Pooled it
- Satiety responsiveness following dietary exposure to ultra-processed foods differing in texture-derived eating rate: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled crossover diet intervention.European journal of nutrition · 2026Trial
- Effects of SativexNutrients · 2026Trial
- Eating rate has sustained effects on energy intake from ultraprocessed diets: a 2-week ad libitum dietary randomized controlled crossover trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- A Randomised Feasibility Study Assessing Acute Physiological Responses to Weight Stigma in Women Living With Obesity.Clinical obesity · 2026Trial
- Trial
287 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This report describes a set of scientific procedures used to assess the impact of foods and food ingredients on the expression of appetite (psychological and behavioural). An overarching priority has been to enable potential evaluators of health claims about foods to identify justified claims and to exclude claims that are not supported by scientific evidence for the effect cited. This priority follows precisely from the principles set down in the PASSCLAIM report. The report allows the evaluation of the strength of health claims, about the effects of foods on appetite, which can be sustained on the basis of the commonly used scientific designs and experimental procedures. The report includes different designs for assessing effects on satiation as opposed to satiety, detailed coverage of the extent to which a change in hunger can stand alone as a measure of appetite control and an extensive discussion of the statistical procedures appropriate for handling data in this field of research. Because research in this area is continually evolving, new improved methodologies may emerge over time and will need to be incorporated into the framework. One main objective of the report has been to produce guidance on good practice in carrying out appetite research, and not to set down a series of commandments that must be followed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.