Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20122136›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2010

Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods.

J Blundell, C de Graaf, T Hulshof, S Jebb, B Livingstone, A Lluch, D Mela, S Salah, E Schuring, H van der Knaap and 1 more

10 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 10 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 347 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
347citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
41.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01806688 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Study of the Effect of Snacks on Appetite Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Boniface HospitalRan2013 to 2014Enrolled46ConditionsHealthy Canadians, Appetite ControlArmsgluten-free high protein snack #1, gluten-free snack with similar energy density but 1/2 the protein as snack #1, non-caloric control, gluten-free high protein and high fibre snack #2, gluten-free snack with similar energy density, but less protein and fibre than snack #2
NCT02111486 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Study of the Effect of Certain Breakfasts on Appetite Control.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Boniface HospitalRan2015 to 2015Enrolled0ConditionsAppetite, Post-prandial Glucose ResponseArmsbreakfast
NCT02297074 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Glycemic Index Glycemic Load and Insulinemic Index of Spanish Breads and Their Effect on Incretins and Gastrointestinal Hormones Related With Appetite Regulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrganización Interprofesional Agroalimentaria de Cereales Panificables y DerivadosRan2013 to 2013Enrolled22ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsOrdinary white bread, Precooked-Frozen White Bread, Candeal-flour White Bread, Alfacar White Bread, Wholemeal Bread
NCT02575131 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Breakfast Test Products on Acute Satiety Scores in Different Test Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorTNORan2015 to 2016Enrolled32ConditionsObesityArmswhole wheat bread yeast basis, Oatmeal, Cheerios, whole wheat sourdough bread, standard breakfast
NCT02734238 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Physiological and Psychological Effects of Testosterone During Severe Energy Deficit and Recovery: a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPennington Biomedical Research CenterRan2016 to 2017Enrolled53ConditionsCaloric Restriction, ExerciseArmsSesame Oil, testosterone enanthate
NCT03306706 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial Examining the Effect of Peas in Muffins on Post-prandial Glycaemic Response and Satiety in Healthy Adults.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Boniface HospitalRan2017 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsPost-prandial Glycaemic Response, SatietyArmsWhole pea muffins, Split pea muffins, Wheat muffins
NCT03306927 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial Examining the Effect of Peas in Chili on Post-prandial Glycaemic Response and Satiety in Healthy Adults.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Boniface HospitalRan2017 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsPost-prandial Glycaemic Response, SatietyArmsWhole yellow pea chili, Split yellow pea chili, Rice chili
NCT03506932 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial Examining the Effect of Yellow Pea Flour in Bread on Post-prandial Glycaemic Response in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Boniface HospitalRan2019 to 2019Enrolled24ConditionsPost-prandial Glycaemic ResponseArmsUntreated, Heat treated with 0% moisture, Heat treated with 10% moisture, Wheat
NCT03901157 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Repetitive Intake of Lipids in Alginate Gel on Food Intake and Satiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled44ConditionsSatiation, Overweight and Obesity, Satiety ResponseArmsYogurt A: Active, Yogurt B: Control
NCT07758387 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Functional Gummies With Polydextrose Versus Placebo for Weight Control in Adults With Overweight or Obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorNutris We Care About You S.L.Ran2026 to 2027Enrolled96ConditionsObesity & OverweightArmsPolydextrose Gummies, Placebo Gummies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

347 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 987 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Effects of SativexNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

287 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

J BlundellInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
C de Graaf
T Hulshof
S Jebb
B Livingstone
A Lluch
D Mela
S Salah
E Schuring
H van der Knaap
M Westerterp
Unilever (Netherlands) · NLDanone (France) · FRMaastricht University · NLMRC Human Nutrition Research · GBRobert Bosch (United States) · USUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105960389Medical Research Council U.1059.00.013(60389)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes a set of scientific procedures used to assess the impact of foods and food ingredients on the expression of appetite (psychological and behavioural). An overarching priority has been to enable potential evaluators of health claims about foods to identify justified claims and to exclude claims that are not supported by scientific evidence for the effect cited. This priority follows precisely from the principles set down in the PASSCLAIM report. The report allows the evaluation of the strength of health claims, about the effects of foods on appetite, which can be sustained on the basis of the commonly used scientific designs and experimental procedures. The report includes different designs for assessing effects on satiation as opposed to satiety, detailed coverage of the extent to which a change in hunger can stand alone as a measure of appetite control and an extensive discussion of the statistical procedures appropriate for handling data in this field of research. Because research in this area is continually evolving, new improved methodologies may emerge over time and will need to be incorporated into the framework. One main objective of the report has been to produce guidance on good practice in carrying out appetite research, and not to set down a series of commandments that must be followed.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineGuidelines as TopicAppetite RegulationEatingFoodFood LabelingHumansSatiation

Identifiers

PMID20122136
PMCPMC3609405
OpenAlexW2121499324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 4 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.