Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20121480›Full record

ArticleExpert review of proteomics2010

Proteomics in bone research.

Hengwei Zhang, Robert Recker, Wai-Nang Paul Lee, Gary Guishan Xiao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of proteomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Osteoblasts and Adipocytes and its Role in Treatment of Osteoporosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hengwei ZhangGenomics & Functional Proteomics Laboratories, Osteoporosis Research Center; Creighton University Medical Center, 601 N 30th Street, Suite 6730, Omaha, NE 68131, USA. hengweizhang@creighton.edu
Robert Recker
Wai-Nang Paul Lee
Gary Guishan Xiao
CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy · USOsteoporosis Research CenterUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

A Study of Reduced Bone Quality as a Cause of FracturesR01AR054496 · NIAMS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI RECKER, ROBERT ROY · 2008 to 2012
$4.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is prevalent among the elderly and is a major cause of bone fracture in this population. Bone integrity is maintained by the dynamic processes of bone resorption and bone formation (bone remodeling). Osteoporosis results when there is an imbalance of the two counteracting processes. Bone mineral density, measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry has been the primary method to assess fracture risk for decades. Recent studies demonstrated that measurement of bone turnover markers allows for a dynamic assessment of bone remodeling, while imaging techniques, such as dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, do not. The application of proteomics has permitted discoveries of new, sensitive, bone turnover markers, which provide unique information for clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients with bone diseases. This review summarizes the recent findings of proteomic studies on bone diseases, properties of mesenchymal stem cells with high expansion rates and osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation, with emphasis on the role of quantitative proteomics in the study of signaling dynamics, biomarkers and discovery of therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBone and BonesBone DiseasesBone RemodelingHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteoporosisProteomicsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20121480
PMCPMC2848984
OpenAlexW2087433310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.