Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20119709›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2010

The response of the host microcirculation to bacterial sepsis: does the pathogen matter?

Matthieu Legrand, Eva Klijn, Didier Payen, Can Ince

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Accentuate the (Gram) positive.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular mechanisms of organ damage in sepsis: an overview.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthieu LegrandDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, s Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.legrand@libertysurf.fr
Eva Klijn
Didier Payen
Can Ince

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis results from the interaction between a host and an invading pathogen. The microcirculatory dysfunction is now considered central in the development of the often deadly multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in septic shock patients. The microcirculatory flow shutdown and flow shunting leading to oxygen demand and supply mismatch at the cellular level and the local activation of inflammatory pathways resulting from the leukocyte-endothelium interactions are both features of the sepsis-induced microcirculatory dysfunction. Although the host response through the inflammatory and immunologic response appears to be critical, there are also evidences that Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria can exert different effects at the microcirculatory level. In this review we discuss available data on the potential bacterial-specific microcirculatory alterations observed during sepsis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial InfectionsEndothelium, VascularGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrocirculationSepsis

Identifiers

PMID20119709
PMCPMC2832870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.