Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20118271›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2010

Genomic analysis of wild tomato introgressions determining metabolism- and yield-associated traits.

Laura Kamenetzky, Ramón Asís, Sebastián Bassi, Fabiana de Godoy, Luisa Bermúdez, Alisdair R Fernie, Marie-Anne Van Sluys, Julia Vrebalov, James J Giovannoni, Magdalena Rossi and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DuplicatedPeerJ · 2019
    Article
  4. New insights into tomato microRNAs.Scientific reports · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using a periclinal chimera to unravel layer-specific gene expression in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of an esterase in flavor volatile variation within the tomato clade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetic dissection of vitamin E biosynthesis in tomato.Journal of experimental botany · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Laura KamenetzkyInstituto de Biotecnología, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaría, and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, B1712WAA Castelar, Argentina.
Ramón Asís
Sebastián Bassi
Fabiana de Godoy
Luisa Bermúdez
Alisdair R Fernie
Marie-Anne Van Sluys
Julia Vrebalov
James J Giovannoni
Magdalena Rossi
Fernando Carrari
United States Department of Agriculture · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DECornell University · USNational Agricultural Technology Institute · ARNational Institute of Industrial Technology · ARUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the aim of determining the genetic basis of metabolic regulation in tomato fruit, we constructed a detailed physical map of genomic regions spanning previously described metabolic quantitative trait loci of a Solanum pennellii introgression line population. Two genomic libraries from S. pennellii were screened with 104 colocated markers from five selected genomic regions, and a total of 614 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)/cosmids were identified as seed clones. Integration of sequence data with the genetic and physical maps of Solanum lycopersicum facilitated the anchoring of 374 of these BAC/cosmid clones. The analysis of this information resulted in a genome-wide map of a nondomesticated plant species and covers 10% of the physical distance of the selected regions corresponding to approximately 1% of the wild tomato genome. Comparative analyses revealed that S. pennellii and domesticated tomato genomes can be considered as largely colinear. A total of 1,238,705 bp from both BAC/cosmid ends and nine large insert clones were sequenced, annotated, and functionally categorized. The sequence data allowed the evaluation of the level of polymorphism between the wild and cultivated tomato species. An exhaustive microsynteny analysis allowed us to estimate the divergence date of S. pennellii and S. lycopersicum at 2.7 million years ago. The combined results serve as a reference for comparative studies both at the macrosyntenic and microsyntenic levels. They also provide a valuable tool for fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci in tomato. Furthermore, they will contribute to a deeper understanding of the regulatory factors underpinning metabolism and hence defining crop chemical composition.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantQuantitative Trait LociChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialGenetic MarkersMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSolanum lycopersicumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20118271
PMCPMC2850009
OpenAlexW2045640185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.