Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20116893›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2010

[Patient satisfaction with the patient-doctor relationship measured using the questionnaire (PDRQ-9)].

Jesús Martín-Fernández, M Isabel del Cura-González, Tomás Gómez-Gascón, Eva Fernández-López, Guadalupe Pajares-Carabajal, Bernardo Moreno-Jiménez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06420609 (Efficacy of a Proactive Approach to Death Thoughts in People With Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06420609 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Proactive Approach to Death Thoughts in People With Advanced Cancer: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Internacional de CatalunyaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled168ConditionsDeath, Advanced CancerArmsGo-TAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jesús Martín-FernándezCS San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Area 8 de AP, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España. jmartinefe@hotmail.com
M Isabel del Cura-González
Tomás Gómez-Gascón
Eva Fernández-López
Guadalupe Pajares-Carabajal
Bernardo Moreno-Jiménez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe patient satisfaction of their relationship with the family physician, using the PDRQ-9 questionnaire and assess its psychometric properties.

designCross-sectional study.

settingSix Primary Care Health centres in the Community of Madrid, Spain.

participantsFour hundred and fifty one patients randomly selected from those who had just visited their family physician.

interventionsInterviews were carried out to collect demographic characteristics, health needs, the accessibility to the service, and the socioeconomic situation of the subjects. MEASUREMENTS: The PDRQ-9 responses were collected and a synthetic satisfaction index was constructed. A multivariable model was designed to explain differences in satisfaction.

resultsThe mean satisfaction index was 4.41 (95% CI: 4.33-4.48) on a scale of 1 (the worst) to 5 (the best satisfaction possible), with a median of 4.78 (interquartile range 4.00-5.00). Four of every 10 subjects expressed the maximum possible satisfaction ("ceiling effect"). A single factor explained 75.3% of the variance, with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.952. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) and living in rural areas (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.94-2.20) were associated with above average satisfaction.

conclusionsPrimary care users feel their relationship with their family physicians are very satisfactory, particularly in those who are older and who live in rural areas. The PDRQ-9 questionnaire shows a high internal consistency, but it is not good enough to discriminate in the upper part of the scale.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20116893
PMCPMC7024422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.