Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20113921›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2010

Efficacy of a motivational behavioral intervention to promote chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in young women: a randomized controlled trial.

Mariam R Chacko, Constance M Wiemann, Claudia A Kozinetz, Kirk von Sternberg, Mary M Velasquez, Peggy B Smith, Ralph DiClemente

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Behavioral interventions for improving condom use for dual protection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. BMJ open · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mariam R ChackoBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. mchacko@bcm.edu
Constance M Wiemann
Claudia A Kozinetz
Kirk von Sternberg
Mary M Velasquez
Peggy B Smith
Ralph DiClemente

Funding

STD Screening in Young Women: A Stage-based InterventionR01AI047341 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHACKO, MARIAM RENATE · 2001 to 2003
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI47341NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047341PHS HHS 5T71 MC00011-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeeking screening and treatment for chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) by young women is critical to reduction of asymptomatic cervicitis and its complications.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of a client-centered motivational behavioral intervention (MBI), to promote seeking of sexually tranmitted infection (STI) checkups by young women.

methodsThree hundred seventy-six of 770 eligible sexually active, nonpregnant, English-speaking women (mean age 18.5 years) were recruited from an urban reproductive health clinic and randomized to two groups: intervention plus standard care (MBI) or standard care alone (SC). MBI (two sessions plus booster) was based on the Transtheoretical Model of Change and employed motivational interviewing. Outcome measures monitored for 12 months included: client-initiated clinic visits for STI checkups in response to seven high-risk sexual behaviors by self-report (primary), consistent condom use, number of CT and GC episodes, and movement along the stages of change obtained at baseline and 6- and 12-month follow-up assessments (secondary). Analyses included chi-square, logistic regression, and generalized estimating equations.

resultsAt baseline, more than 70% endorsed the action stage of change for seeking STI checkups for three of seven high-risk sexual behaviors. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for the primary or secondary outcomes. Across groups, having multiple partners and being pregnant or thinking one might be pregnant were associated with STI checkups.

conclusionsThis is the first known client-centered clinical trial to promote STI screening. Risk-taking and health-seeking behaviors are complex and interrelated with STI and pregnancy concerns. The intervention may have an effect if it is targeted to women in a less medically connected community-based sample.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthChlamydia InfectionsCondomsFemaleGonorrheaHumansMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicSex EducationSexual BehaviorUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20113921
PMCPMC2818061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.