Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20113481›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2010

Proteomic comparison of the cytosolic proteins of three Bifidobacterium longum human isolates and B. longum NCC2705.

Julio Aires, Patricia Anglade, Fabienne Baraige, Monique Zagorec, Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès, Marie-José Butel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stress Response in Bifidobacteria.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  3. Hydrolyzation of snailVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Proteomic studies on lactic acid bacteria: A review.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julio AiresUniversité Paris Descartes, EA 4065, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Paris, France. julio.aires@univ-paris5.fr
Patricia Anglade
Fabienne Baraige
Monique Zagorec
Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès
Marie-José Butel
Département Génétique Animale · FRMathématiques et Informatique Appliquées du Génome à l'Environnement · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBifidobacteria are natural inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract. In full-term newborns, these bacteria are acquired from the mother during delivery and rapidly become the predominant organisms in the intestinal microbiota. Bifidobacteria contribute to the establishment of healthy intestinal ecology and can confer health benefits to their host. Consequently, there is growing interest in bifidobacteria, and various strains are currently used as probiotic components in functional food products. However, the probiotic effects have been reported to be strain-specific. There is thus a need to better understand the determinants of the observed benefits provided by these probiotics. Our objective was to compare three human B. longum isolates with the sequenced model strain B. longum NCC2705 at the chromosome and proteome levels.

resultsPulsed field electrophoresis genotyping revealed genetic heterogeneity with low intraspecies strain relatedness among the four strains tested. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, we analyzed qualitative differences in the cytosolic protein patterns. There were 45 spots that were present in some strains and absent in others. Spots were excised from the gels and subjected to peptide mass fingerprint analysis for identification. The 45 spots represented 37 proteins, most of which were involved in carbohydrate metabolism and cell wall or cell membrane synthesis. Notably, the protein patterns were correlated with differences in cell membrane properties like surface hydrophobicity and cell agglutination.

conclusionThese results showed that proteomic analysis can be valuable for investigating differences in bifidobacterial species and may provide a better understanding of the diversity of bifidobacteria and their potential use as probiotics.

Indexed as

ProteomicsBacterial ProteinsBifidobacteriumComparative Genomic HybridizationCytosolDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalGenotypeHumansProteomeBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialProteome

Identifiers

PMID20113481
PMCPMC2824696
OpenAlexW2107563726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.