ArticleBMC microbiology2010
Proteomic comparison of the cytosolic proteins of three Bifidobacterium longum human isolates and B. longum NCC2705.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Proteomics in Probiotics Having Anticancer and Chemopreventive Properties.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Stress Response in Bifidobacteria.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- Hydrolyzation of snailVeterinary world · 2022Article
- Variability in Probiotic Formulations Revealed by Proteomics and Physico-chemistry Approach in Relation to the Gut Permeability.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2020Article
- Linoleic acid induces metabolic stress in the intestinal microorganism Bifidobacterium breve DSM 20213.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN68 in response to oxidative shock.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Proteomic studies on lactic acid bacteria: A review.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2018Review
- Heat Acclimation of Bifidobacterium longum and Proteomic Changes Behind It.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2017Article
- High Iron-Sequestrating Bifidobacteria Inhibit Enteropathogen Growth and Adhesion to Intestinal Epithelial CellsFrontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- The Host Genotype and Environment Affect Strain Types of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Inhabiting the Intestinal Tracts of Twins.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015Article
- Proteomics as a Quality Control Tool of Pharmaceutical Probiotic Bacterial Lysate Products.PloS one · 2013Article
- Toxicological significance of azo dye metabolism by human intestinal microbiota.Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition) · 2012Review
- Comparative proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum for the identification of key proteins in bile tolerance.BMC microbiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBifidobacteria are natural inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract. In full-term newborns, these bacteria are acquired from the mother during delivery and rapidly become the predominant organisms in the intestinal microbiota. Bifidobacteria contribute to the establishment of healthy intestinal ecology and can confer health benefits to their host. Consequently, there is growing interest in bifidobacteria, and various strains are currently used as probiotic components in functional food products. However, the probiotic effects have been reported to be strain-specific. There is thus a need to better understand the determinants of the observed benefits provided by these probiotics. Our objective was to compare three human B. longum isolates with the sequenced model strain B. longum NCC2705 at the chromosome and proteome levels.
resultsPulsed field electrophoresis genotyping revealed genetic heterogeneity with low intraspecies strain relatedness among the four strains tested. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, we analyzed qualitative differences in the cytosolic protein patterns. There were 45 spots that were present in some strains and absent in others. Spots were excised from the gels and subjected to peptide mass fingerprint analysis for identification. The 45 spots represented 37 proteins, most of which were involved in carbohydrate metabolism and cell wall or cell membrane synthesis. Notably, the protein patterns were correlated with differences in cell membrane properties like surface hydrophobicity and cell agglutination.
conclusionThese results showed that proteomic analysis can be valuable for investigating differences in bifidobacterial species and may provide a better understanding of the diversity of bifidobacteria and their potential use as probiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.