Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20112435›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2010

Predicting the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease starting lisinopril.

Eric S Johnson, Jessica R Weinstein, Micah L Thorp, Robert W Platt, Amanda F Petrik, Xiuhai Yang, Sharon Anderson, David H Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Potassium Homeostasis, Oxidative Stress, and Human Disease.International journal of clinical and experimental physiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric S JohnsonThe Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA. Eric.S.Johnson@kpchr.org
Jessica R Weinstein
Micah L Thorp
Robert W Platt
Amanda F Petrik
Xiuhai Yang
Sharon Anderson
David H Smith
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USKaiser Permanente · USOregon Health & Science University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

OREGON CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024140 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2011
$61.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAngiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because they slow disease progression. But physicians' concerns about the risk of hyperkalemia (elevated serum potassium level), a potentially fatal adverse effect, may limit optimal management with ACE-inhibitors. We synthesized known predictors of hyperkalemia into a prognostic risk score to predict the risk of hyperkalemia.

methodsWe assembled a retrospective cohort of adult patients with possible CKD (at least one estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) who started an ACE-inhibitor (i.e., incident users) between 1998 and 2006 at a health maintenance organization. We followed patients for hyperkalemia: (1) potassium value >5.5 mmol/L; or (2) diagnosis code for hyperkalemia. Cox regression synthesized a priori predictors recorded in the electronic medical record into a risk score.

resultsWe followed 5171 patients and 145 experienced hyperkalemia, a 90-day risk of 2.8%. Predictors included: age, eGFR, diabetes, heart failure, potassium supplements, potassium-sparing diuretics, and a high dose for the ACE-inhibitor (lisinopril). The risk score separated high-risk patients (top quintile, observed risk of 6.9%) from low-risk patients (bottom quintile, observed risk of 0.7%). Predicted and observed risks agreed within 1% for each quintile. The risk increased gradually in relation to declining eGFR with no apparent threshold for contraindicating ACE-inhibitors.

conclusionsThe risk score separated high-risk patients (who may need more intensive laboratory monitoring) from low-risk patients. The risk score should be validated in other populations before it is ready for use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHyperkalemiaKidney DiseasesLisinoprilMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsLisinopril

Identifiers

PMID20112435
PMCPMC3905673
OpenAlexW1988582819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.