Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20112004›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2010

To think human out of the machine paradigm: Homo Ex Machina.

Alaric Kohler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Parasitic Nature of Social AI: Sharing Minds with the Mindless.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Connecting experience and economy--aspects of disguised positioning.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The "extended mind" approach for a new paradigm of psychology.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2010
    Article
  6. Uncertainty as a fundamental scientific value.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2010
    Article
  7. The machine paradigm and alternative approaches in cognitive science.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alaric KohlerInstitute of Psychology and Education, University of Neuchâtel, Espace L. Agassiz 1, 2001 Neuchâtel, Switzerland. alaric.kohler@unine.ch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article attempts to show that the metaphorical conception of human being as a machine takes a very specific epistemological standpoint. To make short the complex task of considering the implication of this paradigm for psychological and behavioral sciences, three important mismatches between the machine and the living human will be considered. Experience, agency and plasticity of human being are excluded in the scientific models and research activities when they are situated in the machine paradigm. For this reason, I claim that the machine paradigm does not offer the relevant frame for integrating results from various domains or approaches within human sciences, even if it can sometimes produce relevant scientific knowledge in certain domain at the scale of detailed investigation. Due to the importance of overcoming the fragmentation of scientific knowledge to solve the crisis in psychology, an "organic paradigm" should be elaborated which provides a new epistemological framework.

Indexed as

CognitionKnowledgePsychological TheoryArtificial IntelligenceBehavioral SciencesCausalityHumansModels, PsychologicalPhilosophyPsychology, Social

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.