Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20111971›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2010

Bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia: Is there a decline of the treatment efficacy after 2 years?

Bogomil Voykov, Faik Gelisken, Werner Inhoffen, Michael Voelker, Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Focke Ziemssen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Summary of prognostic factors for choroidal neovascularization due to pathological myopia treated by intravitreal bevacizumab injection.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization: a network meta-analysis and review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Forty-two-month outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab in myopic choroidal neovascularization.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2015
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-term effect of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agent for visual acuity and chorioretinal atrophy progression in myopic choroidal neovascularization.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [Therapy of myopic choroidal neovascularization].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bogomil VoykovCentre for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Schleichstr. 12-16, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. bogomil.voykov@gmail.com
Faik Gelisken
Werner Inhoffen
Michael Voelker
Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
Focke Ziemssen
STZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Study failed to prove a statistically significant benefit for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) at the end of the second year. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate whether the early effects seen under anti-VEGF treatment can be maintained over longer follow-up intervals.

methodsThis consecutive case series included all patients at the Centre for Ophthalmology, Tuebingen, with a 2-year follow-up after treatment with 1.25 mg of bevacizumab alone or in combination with photodynamic therapy. Twenty-one eyes from 19 patients were analyzed in the retrospective evaluation of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT).

resultsMean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.64 at baseline to 0.55 after 1 year (p = 0.32) and remained 0.55 at 2 years (p = 0.23). A subgroup analysis showed that mean logMAR BCVA in the monotherapy group improved from 0.7 to 0.5 at 2 years (n = 11, p = 0.06). In the combined therapy group, mean logMAR BCVA changed from 0.55 to 0.59 at 2 years (n = 10, p = 0.69). Mean CFT decreased significantly in both groups by 168 microm (p < 0.001) and 76 microm (p < 0.05) in the monotherapy and in the combined groups, respectively. No complications or adverse effects were observed.

conclusionAlthough the limitations of the study design have to be acknowledged and carefully discussed, we found no obvious superiority of a combined treatment for myopic CNV, at least in terms of the functional outcome and the injection frequency. The results indicate that bevacizumab might be beneficial in the treatment of patients with CNV secondary to pathologic myopia.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabChoroidal NeovascularizationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsVerteporfin

Identifiers

PMID20111971
OpenAlexW2080788600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.