Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20111605›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Macrophage plasticity in experimental atherosclerosis.

Jamila Khallou-Laschet, Aditi Varthaman, Giulia Fornasa, Caroline Compain, Anh-Thu Gaston, Marc Clement, Michaël Dussiot, Olivier Levillain, Stéphanie Graff-Dubois, Antonino Nicoletti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 270 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 514 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Key parameters for designing robust 2D and 3D spheroid models forBioengineering & translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. TheInnate immunity · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jamila Khallou-LaschetUMRS698 INSERM, Paris, France.
Aditi Varthaman
Giulia Fornasa
Caroline Compain
Anh-Thu Gaston
Marc Clement
Michaël Dussiot
Olivier Levillain
Stéphanie Graff-Dubois
Antonino Nicoletti
Giuseppina Caligiuri
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As in human disease, macrophages (MØ) are central players in the development and progression of experimental atherosclerosis. In this study we have evaluated the phenotype of MØ associated with progression of atherosclerosis in the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) knockout (KO) mouse model.We found that bone marrow-derived MØ submitted to M1 and M2 polarization specifically expressed arginase (Arg) II and Arg I, respectively. This distinct arginase expression was used to evaluate the frequency and distribution of M1 and M2 MØ in cross-sections of atherosclerotic plaques of ApoE KO mice. Early lesions were infiltrated by Arg I(+) (M2) MØ. This type of MØ favored the proliferation of smooth muscle cells, in vitro. Arg II(+) (M1) MØ appeared and prevailed in lesions of aged ApoE KO mice and lesion progression was correlated with the dominance of M1 over the M2 MØ phenotype. In order to address whether the M2->M1 switch could be due to a phenotypic switch of the infiltrated cells, we performed in vitro repolarization experiments. We found that fully polarized MØ retained their plasticity since they could revert their phenotype. The analysis of the distribution of Arg I- and Arg II-expressing MØ also argued against a recent recruitment of M1 MØ in the lesion. The combined data therefore suggest that the M2->M1 switch observed in vivo is due to a conversion of cells already present in the lesion. Our study suggests that interventional tools able to revert the MØ infiltrate towards the M2 phenotype may exert an atheroprotective action.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsApolipoproteins EAtherosclerosisCell ProliferationCulture Media, ConditionedMacrophagesMiceMice, KnockoutMuscle, Smooth, VascularApolipoproteins ECulture Media, Conditioned

Identifiers

PMID20111605
PMCPMC2810335
OpenAlexW2035817205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.