Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20111582›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity evaluation of ADVAX, a multigenic, DNA-based clade C/B' HIV-1 candidate vaccine.

Sandhya Vasan, Sarah J Schlesinger, Yaoxing Huang, Arlene Hurley, Angela Lombardo, Zhiwei Chen, Soe Than, Phumla Adesanya, Catherine Bunce, Mark Boaz and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00249106 (Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blinded Phase 1 Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Clade C DNA Vaccine ADVAX e/g + ADVAX p/N-t), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00249106 phase1completednot on this map

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blinded Phase 1 Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Clade C DNA Vaccine ADVAX e/g + ADVAX p/N-t (ADVAX) Administered Intramuscularly to HIV-Uninfected, Healthy Volunteers.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational AIDS Vaccine InitiativeRan2003 to 2005Enrolled45ConditionsHIV InfectionArmsADVAX
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandhya VasanAaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, New York, United States of America. svasan@adarc.org
Sarah J Schlesinger
Yaoxing Huang
Arlene Hurley
Angela Lombardo
Zhiwei Chen
Soe Than
Phumla Adesanya
Catherine Bunce
Mark Boaz
Rosanne Boyle
Eddy Sayeed
Lorna Clark
Daniel Dugin
Claudia Schmidt
Yang Song
Laura Seamons
Len Dally
Martin Ho
Carol Smith
Martin Markowitz
Josephine Cox
Dilbinder K Gill
Jill Gilmour
Michael C Keefer
Patricia Fast
David D Ho
International AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USAaron Diamond AIDS Research Center · USEmmes (United States) · USImperial College London · GBRockefeller University · USInternational HIV/AIDS Alliance · GBUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a Phase I dose escalation trial of ADVAX, a DNA-based candidate HIV-1 vaccine expressing Clade C/B' env, gag, pol, nef, and tat genes. Sequences were derived from a prevalent circulating recombinant form in Yunnan, China, an area of high HIV-1 incidence. The objective was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ADVAX in human volunteers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsADVAX or placebo was administered intramuscularly at months 0, 1 and 3 to 45 healthy volunteers not at high risk for HIV-1. Three dosage levels [0.2 mg (low), 1.0 mg (mid), and 4.0 mg (high)] were tested. Twelve volunteers in each dosage group were assigned to receive ADVAX and three to receive placebo in a double-blind design. Subjects were followed for local and systemic reactogenicity, adverse events, and clinical laboratory parameters. Study follow up was 18 months. Humoral immunogenicity was evaluated by anti-gp120 binding ELISA. Cellular immunogenicity was assessed by a validated IFNgamma ELISpot assay and intracellular cytokine staining. ADVAX was safe and well-tolerated, with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. Local and systemic reactogenicity events were reported by 64% and 42% of vaccine recipients, respectively. The majority of events were mild. The IFNgamma ELISpot response rates to any HIV antigen were 0/9 (0%) in the placebo group, 3/12 (25%) in the low-dosage group, 4/12 (33%) in the mid-dosage group, and 2/12 (17%) in the high-dosage group. Overall, responses were generally transient and occurred to each gene product, although volunteers responded to single antigens only. Binding antibodies to gp120 were not detected in any volunteers, and HIV seroconversion did not occur. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: ADVAX delivered intramuscularly is safe, well-tolerated, and elicits modest but transient cellular immune responses.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00249106.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAIDS VaccinesDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFlow CytometryHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHumansImmunity, CellularMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAIDS VaccinesHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID20111582
PMCPMC2799527
OpenAlexW2057487103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.