Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20110990›Full record

ReviewNature2010

The endocytic matrix.

Giorgio Scita, Pier Paolo Di Fiore

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 261 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
261citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

261 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endosomal HAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Bispecific antibody drug conjugates: Making 1+1>2.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exosome-Autophagy Crosstalk in Enveloped Virus Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Cells · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

201 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giorgio ScitaIFOM, the FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology Foundation, at the IFOM-IEO Campus, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy. giorgio.scita@ifom-ieo-campus.it
Pier Paolo Di Fiore

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endocytosis has long been thought of as simply a way for cells to internalize nutrients and membrane-associated molecules. But an explosive growth in knowledge has given a new dimension to our understanding of this process. It now seems that endocytosis is a master organizer of signalling circuits, with one of its main roles being the resolution of signals in space and time. Many of the functions of endocytosis that are emerging from recent research cannot yet be reconciled with the canonical view of intracellular trafficking but, instead, point to endocytosis being integrated at a deeper level in the cellular 'master plan' (the cellular network of signalling circuits that lie at the base of the cell's make-up). Deconvolution of this level, which we call the 'endocytic matrix', might uncover a fundamental aspect of how a cell is built.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaSignal TransductionAnimalsCell DivisionCell MembraneCellsCellular ReprogrammingEndocytosisGenes, p53HumansMitosisSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID20110990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.