ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2010
Hydrophobic side chain dynamics of a glutamate receptor ligand binding domain.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamics of cleft closure of the GluA2 ligand-binding domain in the presence of full and partial agonists revealed by hydrogen-deuterium exchange.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Amino-terminal domain tetramer organization and structural effects of zinc binding in the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Article
- Role of conformational dynamics in α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor partial agonism.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012Article
- The loss of an electrostatic contact unique to AMPA receptor ligand binding domain 2 slows channel activation.Biochemistry · 2012Article
- Not all desensitizations are created equal: physiological evidence that AMPA receptor desensitization differs for kainate and glutamate.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011Article
- Conformational changes at the agonist binding domain of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
- Structure and mechanism of glutamate receptor ion channel assembly, activation and modulation.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2011Review
- Packing of the extracellular domain hydrophobic core has evolved to facilitate pentameric ligand-gated ion channel function.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ionotropic glutamate receptors are ligand-gated ion channels that mediate much of the fast excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. The extracellular ligand binding core (S1S2) of the GluR2 subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors can be produced as a soluble protein with properties essentially identical to the corresponding domain in the intact, membrane-bound protein. Using a variety of biophysical techniques, much has been learned about the structure and dynamics of S1S2 and the relationship between its ligand-induced conformational changes and the function of the receptor. It is clear that dynamic processes are essential to the function of ionotropic glutamate receptors. We have isotopically labeled side chain methyls of GluR2 S1S2 and used NMR spectroscopy to study their dynamics on the ps-ns and mus-ms time scales. Increased disorder is seen in regions that are part of the key dimer interface in the intact protein. When glutamate is bound, the degree of ps-ns motion is less than that observed with other ligands, suggesting that the physiological agonist binds to a preformed binding site. At the slower time scales, the degree of S1S2 flexibility induced by ligand binding is greatest for willardiine partial agonists, least for antagonists, and intermediate for full agonists. Notable differences among bound ligands are in the region of the protein that forms a hinge between two lobes that close upon agonist binding, and along the beta-sheet in Lobe 2. These motions provide clues as to the functional properties of partial agonists and to the conformational changes associated with lobe closure and channel activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.