ArticleSurgical endoscopy2010
Peritoneal inflammatory response of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) versus laparoscopy with carbon dioxide and air pneumoperitoneum.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective effects of postconditioning in transvaginally created pneumoperitoneum.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Successful laparoscope-assisted orchiectomy in three cryptorchid sheep.Veterinary and animal science · 2020Article
- Room air versus carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum: effects on oxidative state, apoptosis and histology of splanchnic organs.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Randomized trial on the physiologic impact of NOTES.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- Stress response and well-being after open, laparoscopic, and NOTES transgastric uterine horn resection in a randomized porcine model.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- Acute inflammatory response to transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy: an experimental study in swine.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2013Article
- Perioperative inflammatory response in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Effect of transgastric peritoneal access on peritoneal innate cellular immunity: experimental study in swine.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
- Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Article
- Inflammatory impact of NOTES peritoneoscopy is not different from that of laparoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- A review of equine laparoscopy.ISRN veterinary science · 2012Article
- Natural orifice transesophageal endoscopic surgery: state of the art.Minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
- Assessing the invasiveness of NOTES perforated viscus repair: a comparative study of NOTES and laparoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe immunologic and physiologic effects of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) versus traditional surgical approaches are poorly understood. Previous investigations have shown that NOTES and laparoscopy share similar inflammatory cytokine profiles except for a possible late-phase tissue necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) depression with NOTES. The local peritoneal reaction and immunomodulatory influence of pneumoperitoneum agents in NOTES also are not known and may play an important role in altering the physiologic insult induced by NOTES.
methodsIn this study, 51 animals were divided into four study groups, which respectively underwent abdominal exploration via transgastric NOTES using room air (AIR) or carbon dioxide (CO(2)) or via laparoscopy (LX) using AIR or CO(2) for pneumoperitoneum. Laparotomy and sham surgeries were additionally performed as control conditions. Measurements of TNF-alpha, interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), and IL-6 were performed for peritoneal fluid collected after 0, 2, 4, and 6 h and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 7.
resultsOf the 45 animals assessed, 6 were excluded because of technical operative complications. The findings showed that LX-CO(2) generated the most pronounced response with all three inflammatory markers. However, no significant differences were detected between LX-CO(2) and either NOTES group at these peak points. No differences were encountered between NOTES-CO(2) and NOTES-AIR. Subgroup comparisons showed significantly higher levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 with NOTES-CO(2) than with LX-AIR on POD 1 (p = 0.022) and POD 2 (p = 0.002). The LX-CO(2) subgroup had significantly higher levels of TNF-alpha than the LX-AIR subgroup at 4 h (p = 0.013) and on POD 1 (p = 0.021). No late-phase TNF-alpha depression occurred in the NOTES animals.
conclusionThe local inflammatory reaction to NOTES was similar to that with traditional laparoscopy, and the previously described late-phase systemic TNF-alpha depression in serum was not reproduced. At the peritoneal level, NOTES is no more physiologically stressful than laparoscopy. Furthermore, regardless of which gas was used, the role of the pneumoperitoneum agent did not affect the cytokine profile after NOTES, suggesting that air pneumoperitoneum is adequate for NOTES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20108153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.