ArticleHeart and vessels2009
Detection of coronary artery disease by free-breathing, whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: our initial experience.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2016Pooled it
- ASCI 2010 appropriateness criteria for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging guideline working group.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010Guideline
- Effects of intravenous atrial natriuretic peptide and nitroglycerin on coronary vasodilation and flow velocity determined using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nonischemic heart failure.Heart and vessels · 2013Trial
- Motion robust coronary MR angiography using zigzag centric ky-kz trajectory and high-resolution deep learning reconstruction.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of coronary plaque morphology in patients with stable angina.Heart and vessels · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free-breathing, whole heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has gained great attention as a totally noninvasive diagnostic modality for the detection of coronary artery disease. We examined the accuracy of coronary MRA to identify the presence or absence of coronary artery stenosis in comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Free-breathing, whole heart coronary MRA was performed in 43 consecutive patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography. A total of 172 coronary arteries and 344 coronary artery segments were analyzed. In the coronary artery segment-based analysis, the sensitivity to detect coronary stenosis >/=50% was 82% and specificity was 100%. The accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 97%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. In the vessel-based analysis the sensitivity was 86%, specificity 99%, accuracy 95%, positive predictive value 98%, and negative predictive value 94%. In the patient-based analysis, the sensitivity to detect coronary stenosis <50% was 97% and the specificity to define luminal narrowing <50% was 90%. The accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 95%, 97%, and 90%, respectively. Free-breathing, whole heart coronary MRA yields excellent diagnostic accuracy to detect significant coronary artery disease and has the potential to become the routine diagnostic modality for patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.