ArticleHeart and vessels2009
Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of pulmonary embolism in adult patients following neurosurgery: a Chinese single-center, retrospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Low awareness of venous thromboembolism among neurosurgical hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional study.Thrombosis journal · 2023Article
- Risk factors associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related large vein thrombosis in neurological intensive care patients.Intensive care medicine · 2012Article
- Article
- Differentiation between acute and chronic cor pulmonales with midventricular systolic strain of the right ventricle in the emergency department.Heart and vessels · 2011Article
- Clinical features and risk factor analysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis in Chinese neurosurgical patients.Journal of neurosciences in rural practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to clarify the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in neurosurgical patients. Prospective study for venous thromboembolism screening after neurosurgery was conducted. Thirty-seven patients were screened by ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities at an average of 12 days postoperatively. All patients received standard thromboprophylaxis using graded compression stocking with/without intermittent pneumatic compression following the VTE prevention guidelines. Definitive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism was made by contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography. Prevalence of deep vein thrombosis of the lower legs was 13.5% (5/37). Incidence of pulmonary embolism was 60% (3/5) in patients having deep vein thrombosis. All patients having venous thromboembolism were asymptomatic. In high-risk patients, VTE prevalence after neurosurgery was high even under mechanical prophylaxis. Additional pharmacological prophylaxis should be considered for patients with high risk of VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.