ArticleHeart and vessels2009
Factors related to in-hospital heart failure are very different for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of diagnostic and prognostic models for heart failure in unstable angina patients.Open heart · 2026Article
- Analysis of 10-year nationwide population-based data on sex differences in hospitalization for heart failure.Heart and vessels · 2013Article
- Survival and changes in physical ability after coronary revascularization for octa-nonagenerian patients with acute coronary syndrome.Heart and vessels · 2011Article
- Impact of diabetic status on the hyperglycemia-induced adverse risk of short term outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Middle East: findings from the Gulf registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE).Clinical medicine & research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) resulted in different degrees of damage to the heart muscle, and yet, when factors related to in-hospital outcomes were examined, these two subsets were often lumped together as non-STelevation acute coronary syndrome. Therefore, we investigated predictors of in-hospital heart failure (HF) in UA and NSTEMI separately. Factors related to HF (Killip > or = 2) were analyzed for NSTEMI and UA in a Thai Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) registry conducted in 17 institutions between 2002 and 2005. The registry comprised of 9373 single admissions age 65.1 +/- 12.3 years, 40.2% women, and 45.1% with HF. There were 3548 NSTEMI and 1989 UA with HF prevalence of 56.2% and 27.4%, respectively. Heart failure patients were older, more were women, sicker (as shown by more of those with shock, postcardiac arrest, and breathless on admission), more with diabetes mellitus (DM), received less intervention and medication, and showed higher total death (19.3% vs 5.3% for NSTEMI with and without HF; and correspondingly, 5.9% and 1.9% for UA). Independent predictors (at presentation) for the development of HF following NSTEMI or UA were age (not sex), breathlessness, and less prevalence of chest pain. However, shock and DM were risks only for NSTEMI but not UA. Heart failure was found to be a factor for in-hospital death for NSTEMI only, with odds ratio of 2.84 (confidence interval 2.11-3.82) and 3.23 (2.25-4.64) for total and cardiac deaths, respectively. Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and UA showed substantial differences in factors related to predictors for in-hospital outcome such that these should be examined separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.