ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2011
WT1 peptide vaccination in a CML patient: induction of effective cytotoxic T lymphocytes and significance of peptide administration interval.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and tolerability evaluation of the use of Montanide ISA™51 as vaccine adjuvant: A systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Pooled it
- Decade-long WT1-specific CTLs induced by WT1 peptide vaccination.International journal of hematology · 2024Article
- T cell receptor-engineered T cells for leukemia immunotherapy.Cancer cell international · 2019Review
- Selective inhibition of regulatory T cells by targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway.Cancer immunology research · 2014Article
- The role of peptide and DNA vaccines in myeloid leukemia immunotherapy.Cancer cell international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although antigen-specific immune responses including cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) against antigen peptide could be enhanced after tumor antigen peptide vaccinations, the immune responses do not necessarily result in a decrease or eradication of tumor cells in the vaccination trials. We focused on whether antigen-specific CTLs could be damaged by the repeated stimulation of antigenic peptide and whether regulatory T (Treg) cells would be increased by the administration of WT1 peptide. We administered WT1 peptide 22 times over 18 months in a CML patient who was being treated with imatinib. Although WT1 peptide administration every 2 weeks did not show any beneficial effects on the minimal residual disease (copies of bcr-abl transcripts), the transcripts remarkably decreased to the level of major molecular response after changing the administration interval of WT1 peptide from 2 to 4 weeks. An ex vivo study demonstrated that re-stimulation with WT1 peptide made WT1-specific T cells less reactive to WT1 tetramers and the impaired reactivity of CTLs lasted at least for 1 week. In addition, the cytotoxicity of the T cells was hampered by re-stimulation. Treg cells increased up to more than fivefold at the end of the WT1 administration period. The present findings suggested that the administration of the peptide every 4 weeks is superior to every 2 weeks. In addition, the findings that Treg cells increased gradually in accordance with the duration of WT1 peptide administration revealed the significance of manipulating Treg cells for establishing an efficient tumor antigen peptide vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.