Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20107758›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2010

[Prophylaxis for thromboembolism in internal medicine and family practice].

R M Bauersachs, S Haas

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R M BauersachsMedizinische Klinik IV, Max Ratschow-Klinik für Angiologie, Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Darmstadt, Deutschland. Rupert.Bauersachs@klinikum-darmstadt.de
S Haas
Klinikum Darmstadt · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although up to 80% of fatal pulmonary emboli occur in nonsurgical patients, conclusive studies on the prevention of thrombosis have only become available in the last 10 years. Bedridden inpatients with acute medical diseases require pharmacologic prophylaxis for thrombosis with unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin or with fondaparinux. This also holds true for patients with underlying malignancies or those suffering from acute ischemic stroke or paretic leg. The challenges to thrombosis prophylaxis are posed by ensuring that uninterrupted prophylaxis is continued after hospital discharge in cases of persisting risk, determining the indications and applying thrombosis prophylaxis on an outpatient basis as well as the multimorbidity and often advanced age of the internal medicine patients. The last factor not only entails an elevated risk of thromboembolism but also an increased risk of hemorrhage, especially in patients with renal insufficiency or platelet inhibitors. Product-specific recommendations and restrictions on pharmacologic prophylaxis need to be considered. Thromboprophylaxis as applied in internal medicine and family practice represents an effective measure to prevent symptomatic and fatal thromboembolisms, but due to multimorbidity and polytherapy of medical patients it requires careful monitoring.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsFamily PracticeFibrinolytic AgentsHumansInternal MedicineThromboembolismAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20107758
OpenAlexW2131942537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.