ArticleDer Internist2010
[Treatment of venous thromboembolism].
Article in Der Internist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main objectives in the treatment of venous thromboembolism are to prevent clot extension and pulmonary embolism, to reduce mortality and to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events as well as postthrombotic disorders. Initial and effective anticoagulation with heparin, preferably with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or with fondaparinux is the most important measure. Unfractioned heparin (UFH) is as effective as LMWH, but requires coagulation-monitoring and is associated with a higher risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In patients with renal insufficiency direct determination of anti-factor Xa activity and dose adjustment is recommended, since drug accumulation can occur over time. In those patients UFH instead of LMWH might be favored. Long-term treatment should be administered with vitamin K-antagonists (INR-target range 2-3) for a duration of 3 to 6 months. In case of recurrent venous thromboembolism, indefinite therapy is recommended. Additional treatment with compression stockings is reasonable. Patients who do not require hospital treatment for other conditions, who have a low bleeding risk, no excessive venous congestion and no symptomatic pulmonary embolism can safely be treated at home. In most cases bed rest is not necessary. Thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy is seldomly indicated in severe thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.