ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2010
Simultaneous measurement of noise and spatial resolution in PET phantom images.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel method for harmonization of PET image spatial resolution without phantoms.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- The RSNA QIBA Profile for Amyloid PET as an Imaging Biomarker for Cerebral Amyloid Quantification.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.Medical physics · 2022Article
- The impact of iterative reconstruction protocol, signal-to-background ratio and background activity on measurement of PET spatial resolution.Japanese journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018Article
- Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of an Emission Tomography System for Quantitative Imaging.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017Article
- Effective noise-suppressed and artifact-reduced reconstruction of SPECT data using a preconditioned alternating projection algorithm.Medical physics · 2015Article
- Intra-individual comparison of PET/CT with different body weight-adapted FDG dosage regimens.Acta radiologica open · 2015Article
- High-throughput multiple-mouse imaging with micro-PET/CT for whole-skeleton assessment.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2014Article
- Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.Physics in medicine and biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an aid to evaluating image reconstruction and correction algorithms in positron emission tomography, a phantom procedure has been developed that simultaneously measures image noise and spatial resolution. A commercially available (68)Ge cylinder phantom (20 cm diameter) was positioned in the center of the field-of-view and two identical emission scans were sequentially performed. Image noise was measured by determining the difference between corresponding pixels in the two images and by calculating the standard deviation of these difference data. Spatial resolution was analyzed using a Fourier technique to measure the extent of the blurring at the edge of the phantom images. This paper addresses the noise aspects of the technique as the spatial resolution measurement has been described elsewhere. The noise measurement was validated by comparison with data obtained from multiple replicate images over a range of noise levels. In addition, we illustrate how simultaneous measurement of noise and resolution can be used to evaluate two different corrections for random coincidence events: delayed event subtraction and singles-based randoms correction. For a fixed number of iterations of the maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization algorithm, the singles-based correction gave rise to higher noise than delayed event subtraction. However, when noise and resolution were measured simultaneously it was shown that singles-based randoms correction gave rise to lower noise than delayed event subtraction for a fixed spatial resolution. The proposed method of simultaneously measuring image noise and spatial resolution is useful for evaluating reconstruction algorithms and may aid standardization of data collection between centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.