Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20107132›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

Response latency to lingual taste stimulation distinguishes neuron types within the geniculate ganglion.

Joseph M Breza, Alexandre A Nikonov, Robert J Contreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Novel Mechanism for T1R-Independent Taste Responses to Concentrated Sugars.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Variable Branching Characteristics of Peripheral Taste Neurons Indicates Differential Convergence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancing GABAergic Tone in the Rostral Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Reconfigures Sensorimotor Neural Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Optogenetic Stimulation of Type I GAD65The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph M BrezaDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.
Alexandre A Nikonov
Robert J Contreras
Florida State University · US

Funding

Neural Taste an Thermal Coding in Geniculate GanglionR01DC004785 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONTRERAS, ROBERT JOHN · 2001 to 2011
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-00044NIDCD NIH HHS DC-004785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of response latency in discrimination of chemical stimuli by geniculate ganglion neurons in the rat. Accordingly, we recorded single-cell 5-s responses from geniculate ganglion neurons (n = 47) simultaneously with stimulus-evoked summated potentials (electrogustogram; EGG) from the anterior tongue to signal when the stimulus contacted the lingual epithelium. Artificial saliva served as the rinse solution and solvent for all stimuli [(0.5 M sucrose, 0.03-0.5 M NaCl, 0.01 M citric acid, and 0.02 M quinine hydrochloride (QHCl)], 0.1 M KCl as well as for 0.1 M NaCl +1 μM benzamil. Cluster analysis separated neurons into four groups (sucrose specialists, NaCl specialists, NaCl/QHCl generalists and acid generalists). Artificial saliva elevated spontaneous firing rate and response frequency of all neurons. As a rule, geniculate ganglion neurons responded with the highest frequency and shortest latency to their best stimulus with acid generalist the only exception. For specialist neurons and NaCl/QHCl generalists, the average response latency to the best stimulus was two to four times shorter than the latency to secondary stimuli. For NaCl-specialist neurons, response frequency increased and response latency decreased systematically with increasing NaCl concentration; benzamil significantly decreased NaCl response frequency and increased response latency. Acid-generalist neurons had the highest spontaneous firing rate and were the only group that responded consistently to citric acid and KCl. For many acid generalists, a citric-acid-evoked inhibition preceded robust excitation. We conclude that response latency may be an informative coding signal for peripheral chemosensory neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsCitric AcidGeniculate GanglionLingual NerveMaleModels, AnimalPotassium ChlorideQuinineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeSensory Receptor CellsSodium ChlorideStimulation, ChemicalSucroseTasteCitric AcidPotassium ChlorideQuinineSodium ChlorideSucrose

Identifiers

PMID20107132
PMCPMC2853290
OpenAlexW2153406367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.