ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010
A modeling study of the effects of membrane afterhyperpolarization on spike interval statistics and on ILD encoding in the lateral superior olive.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Physiological models of the lateral superior olive.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Roles for Coincidence Detection in Coding Amplitude-Modulated Sounds.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Subthreshold resonance properties contribute to the efficient coding of auditory spatial cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Discharge patterns in the lateral superior olive of decerebrate cats.Journal of neurophysiology · 2012Article
- A modeling study of the responses of the lateral superior olive to ipsilateral sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lateral superior olive (LSO) is the first nucleus in the ascending auditory pathway that encodes acoustic level information from both ears, the interaural level difference (ILD). This sensitivity is believed to result from the relative strengths of ipsilateral excitation and contralateral inhibition. The study reported here simulated sound-evoked responses of LSO chopper units with a focus on the role of the heterogeneity in membrane afterhyperpolarization (AHP) channels on spike interval statistics and on ILD encoding. A relatively simplified cell model was used so that the effects of interest could be isolated. Specifically, the amplitude and time constant of the AHP conductance within a leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) cell model were studied. This extends the work of others who used a more physiologically detailed model. Results show that differences in these two parameters lead to both the distinctive chopper response patterns and to the level-dependent interval statistics as observed in vivo. In general, diverse AHP characteristics enable an enhanced contrast across population responses with respect to rate gain and temporal correlations. This membrane heterogeneity provides an internal, cell-specific dimension for the neural representation of stimulus information, allowing sensitivity to ILDs of dynamic stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.