Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20105285›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2010

The use of a blood conservation device to reduce red blood cell transfusion requirements: a before and after study.

Amartya Mukhopadhyay, Hwee S Yip, Dimple Prabhuswamy, Yiong H Chan, Jason Phua, Tow K Lim, Patricia Leong

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Anemia in critical illness: insights into etiology, consequences, and management.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2012
    Review
  10. A Standard Push-Pull Protocol for Waste-Free Sampling in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society
    Article
  11. An indigenous modification to ensure closed blood sampling.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amartya MukhopadhyayDepartment of Medicine, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore. amartya.mukherjee@gmail.com
Hwee S Yip
Dimple Prabhuswamy
Yiong H Chan
Jason Phua
Tow K Lim
Patricia Leong
National University Health System · SGNational University Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnaemia and the associated need for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Among many causes, blood losses from repeated diagnostic tests are contributory.

methodsThis is a before and after study in a medical ICU of a university hospital. We used a closed blood conservation device (Venous Arterial blood Management Protection, VAMP, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) to decrease PRBC transfusion requirements. We included all adult (> or =18 years) patients admitted to the ICU with indwelling arterial catheters, who were expected to stay more than 24 hours and were not admitted for active gastrointestinal or any other bleeding. We collected data for six months without VAMP (control group) immediately followed by nine months (active group) with VAMP. A restrictive transfusion strategy in which clinicians were strongly discouraged from any routine transfusions when haemoglobin (Hb) levels were above 7.5 g/dL was adopted during both periods.

resultsEighty (mean age 61.6 years, 49 male) and 170 patients (mean age 60.5 years, 101 male) were included in the control and active groups respectively. The groups were comparable for age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, and Hb levels on discharge and at transfusion. The control group had higher Hb levels on admission (12.4 +/- 2.5 vs. 11.58 +/- 2.8 gm/dL, P = 0.02). Use of a blood conservation device was significantly associated with decreased requirements for PRBC transfusion (control group 0.131 unit vs. active group 0.068 unit PRBC/patient/day, P = 0.02) on multiple linear regression analysis. The control group also had a greater decline in Hb levels (2.13 +/- 2.32 vs. 1.44 +/- 2.08 gm/dL, P = 0.02) at discharge.

conclusionsThe use of a blood conservation device is associated with 1) reduced PRBC transfusion requirements and 2) a smaller decrease in Hb levels in the ICU.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte TransfusionAPACHEBlood Specimen CollectionFemaleHemoglobinsHospital MortalityHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID20105285
PMCPMC2875519
OpenAlexW2079058318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.