Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20104513›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2010

Impact of ambient bright light on agitation in dementia.

Ann Louise Barrick, Philip D Sloane, Christianna S Williams, C Madeline Mitchell, Bettye Rose Connell, Wendy Wood, Susan E Hickman, John S Preisser, Sheryl Zimmerman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Treatment of Sleep Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ann Louise BarrickDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Central Regional Hospital, NC, USA. ann.louise.barrick@dhhs.nc.gov
Philip D Sloane
Christianna S Williams
C Madeline Mitchell
Bettye Rose Connell
Wendy Wood
Susan E Hickman
John S Preisser
Sheryl Zimmerman
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USColorado State University · USEmory University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMarymount University · USUniversity of North Carolina Hospitals · US

Funding

HIGH INTENSITY LIGHT THERAPY IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER01AT000212 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SLOANE, PHILIP D · 2001 to 2003
$1.6M
Quality Assisted Living For The ElderlyK02AG000970 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZIMMERMAN, SHERYL · 2002 to 2006
$516k
Autism Speaks R01AT00212-ASNCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT000212NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT00202NIA NIH HHS K02 AG000970NIA NIH HHS K02 AG00970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of ambient bright light therapy (BLT) on agitation among institutionalized persons with dementia.

methodsHigh intensity, low glare ambient lighting was installed in activity and dining areas of a state psychiatric hospital unit in North Carolina and a dementia-specific residential care facility in Oregon. The study employed a cluster-unit crossover design involving four ambient lighting conditions: AM bright light, PM bright light, All Day bright light, and Standard light. Sixty-six older persons with dementia participated. Outcome measures included direct observation by research personnel and completion by staff caregivers of the 14-item, short form of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI).

resultsAnalyses of observational data revealed that for participants with mild/moderate dementia, agitation was higher under AM light (p = 0.003), PM light (p < 0.001), and All Day light (p = 0.001) than Standard light. There was also a trend toward severely demented participants being more agitated during AM light than Standard light (p = 0.053). Analysis of CMAI data identified differing responses by site: the North Carolina site significantly increased agitation under AM light (p = 0.002) and PM light (p = 0.013) compared with All Day light while in Oregon, agitation was higher for All Day light compared to AM light (p = 0.030). In no comparison was agitation significantly lower under any therapeutic condition, in comparison to Standard lighting.

conclusionsAmbient bright light is not effective in reducing agitation in dementia and may exacerbate this behavioral symptom.

Indexed as

LightingAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFemaleHumansInstitutionalizationLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPhototherapyPsychomotor AgitationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20104513
PMCPMC3711022
OpenAlexW1995652291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.