Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20104432›Full record

ReviewSeminars in reproductive medicine2010

Role of progesterone in endometrial cancer.

J Julie Kim, Eloise Chapman-Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CRL4International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Phosphorylation of IDH1 Facilitates Progestin Resistance in Endometrial Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Julie KimDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. j-kim4@northwestern.edu
Eloise Chapman-Davis
Northwestern University · USRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University

Funding

Interaction of FOXO1 and Progesterone Receptor in Endometrial CancerR21CA127674 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KIM, JI-YONG JULIE · 2008 to 2009
$374k
NCI NIH HHS CA127674NCI NIH HHS R21 CA127674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progesterone is a key hormone in the endometrium that opposes estrogen-driven growth. Insufficient progesterone will result in unopposed estrogen action that could lead to the development of endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Although these endometrial neoplasias can regress in response to progestin treatment, this does not occur in all instances. To understand this resistance to progesterone and to improve on existing hormonal therapies, it is imperative that the molecular mechanisms of progesterone action through its receptor be deciphered in endometrial cancer. This review highlights what is known thus far regarding the efficacy of progestin therapy in the clinic and the role of progesterone in endometrial cancer cell behavior and gene regulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceProgesteroneProgestinsReceptors, ProgesteroneProgesteroneProgestinsReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID20104432
PMCPMC4767501
OpenAlexW2045327531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.