Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20103724›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2010

A phase 2a study of topical perillyl alcohol cream for chemoprevention of skin cancer.

Steven P Stratton, David S Alberts, Janine G Einspahr, Paul M Sagerman, James A Warneke, Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski, Paul B Myrdal, Kelly L Karlage, Brian J Nickoloff, Chris Brooks and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Therapeutic targeting of replicative immortality.Seminars in cancer biology · 2015
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven P StrattonDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85724, USA. sstratton@azcc.arizona.edu
David S Alberts
Janine G Einspahr
Paul M Sagerman
James A Warneke
Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
Paul B Myrdal
Kelly L Karlage
Brian J Nickoloff
Chris Brooks
Kathylynn Saboda
Michael L Yozwiak
Mary F Krutzsch
Chengcheng Hu
Maria Lluria-Prevatt
Zigang Dong
G Timothy Bowden
Peter H Bartels
University of Minnesota · USHormel (United States) · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Justin M Snider · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
VITAMIN A, AND ITS PRECURSORS AND DERIVATIVES AS THERAPEUTIC MODALITIESP01CA027502 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BOWDEN, TIMOTHY · 1985 to 2015
$36.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA023074NCI NIH HHS CA027502NCI NIH HHS P01 CA027502NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemopreventive and antitumor properties of perillyl alcohol (POH) that were studied preclinically indicate that topical POH inhibits both UVB-induced murine skin carcinogenesis (squamous cell tumor models) and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced murine melanoma (transgenic models involving tyrosinase-driven Ras). A previous phase 1 clinical trial in participants with normal-appearing skin showed that topical POH cream was well tolerated at a dose of 0.76% (w/w). Here, we performed a 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2a trial of two different doses of topical POH in individuals with sun-damaged skin. Participants applied POH cream twice daily to each dorsal forearm. Baseline and end-of-study biopsies were taken from each participant to evaluate whether the topical application of POH was effective in reversing actinic damage as evidenced by normalization of quantitative skin histopathologic scores and change in nuclear chromatin pattern as measured by karyometric analysis. There was a borderline reduction in the histopathologic score of the lower-dose POH group compared with the placebo (P = 0.1), but this was not observed in the high-dose group. However, in the high-dose group, a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of nuclei deviating from normal was observed by the use of karyometric analysis (P < 0.01). There was no statistical significance shown in the lower-dose group. No changes were observed in p53 expression, cellular proliferation (by proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression), or apoptosis in either treatment group compared with the placebo group. These results suggest that whereas our karyometric analyses can detect a modest effect of POH in sun-damaged skin, improved delivery into the epidermis may be necessary.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAgedAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisChemopreventionChromatinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaryotypingMaleMiddle AgedMonoterpenesSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsChromatinMonoterpenesperillyl alcohol

Identifiers

PMID20103724
PMCPMC3270887
OpenAlexW2047721448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.