Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20103722›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2010

Biological activity of celecoxib in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers.

Edward S Kim, Waun K Hong, J Jack Lee, Li Mao, Rodolfo C Morice, Diane D Liu, Carlos A Jimenez, Georgie A Eapen, Reuben Lotan, Ximing Tang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Lung cancer chemoprevention with celecoxib in former smokers.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2011
    Trial
  9. Oral iloprost improves endobronchial dysplasia in former smokers.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2011
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Advances in antitumor effects of NSAIDs.Cancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward S KimDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Waun K Hong
J Jack Lee
Li Mao
Rodolfo C Morice
Diane D Liu
Carlos A Jimenez
Georgie A Eapen
Reuben Lotan
Ximing Tang
Robert A Newman
Ignacio I Wistuba
Jonathan M Kurie
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRIAL OF CELECOXIB IN LUNG CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIONP01CA091844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HONG, WAUN KI · 2001 to 2005
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA 091844NCI NIH HHS CA 16672NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091844NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer is the primary cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. One important approach taken to address this problem is the development of effective chemoprevention strategies. In this study, we examined whether the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib, as evidenced by decreased cell proliferation, is biologically active in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers. Current or former smokers with at least a 20 pack-year (pack-year = number of packs of cigarettes per day times number of years smoked) smoking history were randomized into one of four treatment arms (3-month intervals of celecoxib then placebo, celecoxib then celecoxib, placebo then celecoxib, or placebo then placebo) and underwent bronchoscopies with biopsies at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The 204 patients were primarily (79.4%) current smokers: 81 received either low-dose celecoxib or placebo and 123 received either high-dose celecoxib or placebo. Celecoxib was originally administered orally at 200 mg twice daily and the protocol subsequently increased the dose to 400 mg twice daily. The primary end point was change in Ki-67 labeling (from baseline to 3 months) in bronchial epithelium. No cardiac toxicities were observed in the participants. Although the effect of low-dose treatment was not significant, high-dose celecoxib decreased Ki-67 labeling by 3.85% in former smokers and by 1.10% in current smokers-a significantly greater reduction (P = 0.02) than that seen with placebo after adjusting for metaplasia and smoking status. A 3- to 6-month celecoxib regimen proved safe to administer. Celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) was biologically active in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers; additional studies on the efficacy of celecoxib in non-small cell lung cancer chemoprevention may be warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCelecoxibCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPyrazolesAntineoplastic AgentsCelecoxibKi-67 AntigenPyrazolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID20103722
PMCPMC4028718
OpenAlexW2140481652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.