Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20102616›Full record

Trial reportBMC emergency medicine2010

Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.

Helen Snooks, Wai-Yee Cheung, Jacqueline Close, Jeremy Dale, Sarah Gaze, Ioan Humphreys, Ronan Lyons, Suzanne Mason, Yasmin Merali, Julie Peconi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC emergency medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High yield research opportunities in geriatric emergency medicine: prehospital care, delirium, adverse drug events, and falls.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen SnooksCentre for Health Information Research and Evaluation, Swansea University, Swansea UK. h.a.snooks@swansea.ac.uk
Wai-Yee Cheung
Jacqueline Close
Jeremy Dale
Sarah Gaze
Ioan Humphreys
Ronan Lyons
Suzanne Mason
Yasmin Merali
Julie Peconi
Ceri Phillips
Judith Phillips
Stephen Roberts
Ian Russell
Antonio Sánchez
Mushtaq Wani
Bridget Wells
Richard Whitfield
Swansea University · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBMorriston Hospital · GBPrince of Wales Hospital · AUUniversity of Sheffield · GBWelsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany emergency ambulance calls are for older people who have fallen. As half of them are left at home, a community-based response may often be more appropriate than hospital attendance. The SAFER 1 trial will assess the costs and benefits of a new healthcare technology--hand-held computers with computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) software--to help paramedics decide who needs hospital attendance, and who can be safely left at home with referral to community falls services. METHODS/

designPragmatic cluster randomised trial with a qualitative component. We shall allocate 72 paramedics ('clusters') at random between receiving the intervention and a control group delivering care as usual, of whom we expect 60 to complete the trial.Patients are eligible if they are aged 65 or older, live in the study area but not in residential care, and are attended by a study paramedic following an emergency call for a fall. Seven to 10 days after the index fall we shall offer patients the opportunity to opt out of further follow up. Continuing participants will receive questionnaires after one and 6 months, and we shall monitor their routine clinical data for 6 months. We shall interview 20 of these patients in depth. We shall conduct focus groups or semi-structured interviews with paramedics and other stakeholders.The primary outcome is the interval to the first subsequent reported fall (or death). We shall analyse this and other measures of outcome, process and cost by 'intention to treat'. We shall analyse qualitative data thematically. DISCUSSION: Since the SAFER 1 trial received funding in August 2006, implementation has come to terms with ambulance service reorganisation and a new national electronic patient record in England. In response to these hurdles the research team has adapted the research design, including aspects of the intervention, to meet the needs of the ambulance services.In conclusion this complex emergency care trial will provide rigorous evidence on the clinical and cost effectiveness of CCDS for paramedics in the care of older people who have fallen.

trial registrationISRCTN10538608.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overAllied Health PersonnelAmbulancesComputers, HandheldCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support Systems, ClinicalEmergency Medical ServicesHumansSoftwareSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID20102616
PMCPMC2824628
OpenAlexW2104469996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.