ArticlePharmaceutical research2010
A semi-physiological-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to describe the effects of topotecan on b-lymphocyte lineage cells.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A physiological model of granulopoiesis to predict clinical drug induced neutropenia from in vitro bone marrow studies: with application to a cell cycle inhibitor.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2020Article
- Comparative performance of cell life span and cell transit models for describing erythropoietic drug effects.The AAPS journal · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a semi-physiological-based model describing simultaneously the time course of immature and mature B-lymphocytes after topotecan (TPT) administration to tumor-bearing rats.
methodsTwenty-four tumor-bearing BDIX male rats received a single 6 mg/kg intra-peritoneal dose of TPT or saline. Mature and immature B-cell levels were measured every two days during three weeks and showed a very different temporal pattern. Both B-cell populations declined rapidly, reaching the nadir at 3-4 days after TPT administration; however, mature cells returned to baseline at day 8, while immature B-cells stayed at nadir until day 9 instead. Data were modeled using the population approach with NONMEM VI.
resultsThe model developed maintains the proliferation, maturation and degradation elements of previous published models for myelosuppresion. In order to describe the rapid recovery of mature cells, it includes a peripheral compartment providing a constant supply of mature cells to the bloodstream.
conclusionsThe major contribution of the model is its new structure and the dynamical consequences, demonstrating an independent behavior between mature and immature B-cells during recovery. The final model could represent a good basis for the optimization of cytotoxic drugs oriented to attain a maximum antitumor efficacy while minimizing hematological toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.