Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20101444›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2010

Tissue polarity-dependent control of mammary epithelial homeostasis and cancer development: an epigenetic perspective.

Sophie A Lelièvre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Architecture in 3D cell culture: An essential feature for in vitro toxicology.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Building risk-on-a-chip models to improve breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sophie A LelièvreDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences and Purdue Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, Lynn Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2026, USA. lelievre@purdue.edu

Funding

NuMA function in nonmalignant and malignant breast cellsR01CA112017 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LELIEVRE, SOPHIE A. · 2007 to 2012
$872k
Regulation of Apical Polarity in Breast CancerR03CA112613 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI LELIEVRE, SOPHIE A · 2005 to 2006
$150k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112017NCI NIH HHS R03 CA112613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basoapical organization of monolayered epithelia is defined by the presence of hemidesmosomes at the basal cellular pole, where the cell makes contacts with the basement membrane, and tight junctions at the opposite apical pole. In the mammary gland, tight junctions seal cell-cell contacts against the lumen and separate the apical and basolateral cell membranes. This separation is critical to organize intracellular signaling pathways and the cytoskeleton. The study of the impact of the highly organized apical pole, and notably apical polarity regulators (Crb complex, Par complex, and Scrib, Dlg, Lgl proteins) and tight junction proteins on cell phenotype and gene expression has revealed an intricate relationship between apical polarity and the cell nucleus. The goal of this review is to highlight the role of the apical pole of the tissue polarity axis in the epigenetic control of tissue phenotype. The organization of the apical pole and its importance in mammary homeostasis and tumorigenesis will be emphasized before presenting how apical polarity proteins impact gene expression indirectly, by influencing signal transduction and the location of transcription regulators, and directly, by participating in chromatin-associated complexes. The relationship between apical polarity and cell nucleus organizations might explain how apical polarity proteins could switch from nuclear repressors to nuclear promoters of cancerous behavior following alterations in the apical pole. The impact of apical polarity proteins on epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression will be discussed in light of increased evidence supporting a role for apical polarity in the fate of breast neoplasms.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticHomeostasisAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell PolarityDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMammary Glands, AnimalMammary Glands, HumanStem CellsTight Junctions

Identifiers

PMID20101444
PMCPMC2861422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.