Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20101361›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2010

How established wait time benchmarks significantly underestimate total wait times for cardiac surgery.

Jean-Francois Legare, D Li, K J Buth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact on cardiac surgery volume of a comprehensive partnership with Integrated Health Solutions.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Still waiting after all these years.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Francois LegareDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. jean.legare@cdha.nshealth.ca
D Li
K J Buth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWait times for cardiac surgery are well established but may not reflect the total wait time patients experience.

methodsThe Maritime Heart Center (Halifax, Nova Scotia) cardiac surgery database was used to identify all consecutive patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 2002 and 2005 from a single urgency queue. The provincial physician billing database provided a timeline record of dates, physician visits, and diagnoses or procedures performed for each patient. This information was used to assess total and component wait times leading to cardiac surgery.

resultsA total of 705 consecutive patients were included and stratified based on geographical location: urban Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM; n=222), urban non-HRM (n=220) and rural (n=263). Patients from all regions did not differ in age, sex, comorbidities or ventricular function. Using a traditional definition of wait time (time listed), patients waited a median of 56 days (interquartile range [IQR] 38 to 77 days). In comparison, the total wait times based on the time from presentation to surgery were a median of 109 days (IQR 56 to 184 days) for HRM, a median of 121 days (IQR 77 to 184 days) for urban non-HRM and a median of 123 days (IQR 79 to 169 days) for rural patients (P-value nonsignificant). Two modes of presentation emerged that were not influenced by a patient's geographical location. Patients who presented to the emergency department (n=229) waited a median of 73 days. This was significantly less than patients who presented to their family physician (n=476), who waited a median of 135 days (P<0.001). The difference in overall wait for patients presenting to the emergency room was a result of a shorter wait time for referral to a specialist and from seeing a specialist to catheterization.

conclusionThe present pilot study demonstrated that total patient wait times for cardiac care and surgery in Nova Scotia are significantly longer (more than twofold) than traditionally reported wait times for surgery alone.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCoronary Artery BypassWaiting ListsDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart FailureHospital MortalityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNova ScotiaOffice VisitsPhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID20101361
PMCPMC2827229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.