Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20101254›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2010

Behavior of spinal neurons deprived of supraspinal input.

Volker Dietz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. [Closed-loop spinal neural interface combined with rehabilitation training for incomplete spinal cord injury: a case report].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The intractable problems with brain death and possible solutions.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spinal Cord Injury Causes Reduction ofFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Volker DietzSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland. vdietz@paralab.balgrist.ch
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Review discusses the spinal neuronal changes that occur after a complete spinal cord injury (SCI) in humans. Early after an SCI, neither locomotor nor spinal reflex activity can be evoked. Once spinal shock has resolved, locomotor activity and an early spinal reflex component reappear in response to appropriate peripheral afferent input. In the subsequent 4-8 months, clinical signs of spasticity appear, largely as a result of non-neuronal (for example, muscular) changes, whereas locomotor and spinal reflex activity undergo little change. At 9-12 months, the electromyographic amplitude in the leg muscles during assisted locomotion declines, accompanied by a decrease in the amplitude of the early spinal reflex component and an increase in the amplitude of a late spinal reflex component. This exhaustion of locomotor activity also occurs in nonambulatory patients with incomplete SCI. Neuronal dysfunction is fully established 1 year after the injury without further alterations in subsequent years. In chronic SCI, the absence of input from supraspinal sources has been suggested to lead to degradation of neuronal function below the level of the lesion or, alternatively, a predominance of inhibitory signaling to the locomotor pattern generator. Appropriate training and/or provision of afferent input to spinal neurons might help to prevent neuronal dysfunction in chronic SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMotor ActivityMuscle SpasticityNeural ConductionNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20101254
OpenAlexW1968534089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.