Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20100905›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2010

Enhanced sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to concurrent inhibition of aberrant signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and epidermal growth factor receptor or Src.

Soumya Jaganathan, Peibin Yue, James Turkson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soumya JaganathanBurnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32826, USA.
Peibin Yue
James Turkson
University of Central Florida · US

Funding

STATs as a Novel Approach to Cancer TherapyR01CA106439 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI TURKSON, JAMES K · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
Therapeutic Application of Novel Stat3 Inhibitors in Breast and Pancreatic CancerR01CA128865 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI TURKSON, JAMES K · 2008 to 2011
$805k
NCI NIH HHS CA106439NCI NIH HHS CA128865NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106439NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many molecular aberrations occur in pancreatic cancer. Although aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Src, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) are implicated in pancreatic cancer, therapies that target only one of these entities are undermined by signaling cross-talk. In the human pancreatic cancer lines, Panc-1 and Colo-357, pY845EGFR, pY1068EGFR, pY1086EGFR, and pY1173EGFR levels and pY416c-Src are concurrently elevated with aberrantly active Stat3 in a complex signaling cross-talk. Thus, understanding the signaling integration would facilitate the design of effective multiple-targeted therapeutic modalities. In Panc-1 and Colo-357 lines, pY845EGFR, pY1068EGFR, and pY1086EGFR levels are responsive to c-Src inhibition in contrast to pY1173EGFR, which is EGFR kinase-dependent. Constitutively active Stat3 is sensitive to both EGFR and Src inhibition, but the early suppression of aberrantly active Stat3 in response to the inhibition of EGFR and Src is countered by a Janus kinase (Jaks)-dependent reactivation, suggesting that Jaks activity is a compensatory mechanism for Stat3 induction. The inhibition of EGFR, Src, or Stat3 alone induced weak biological responses. By contrast, the concurrent inhibition of Stat3 and EGFR or Src induced greater viability loss and apoptosis and decreased the migration/invasion of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Significantly, the concurrent inhibition, compared with monotargeting modality, induced stronger human pancreatic tumor growth inhibition in xenografts. We infer that the tumor growth inhibition in vivo is caused by the simultaneous suppression of the abnormal functions of Stat3 and EGFR or Src. These studies strongly suggest that the concurrent targeting of Stat3 and EGFR or Src could be a beneficial therapeutic approach for pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayErbB ReceptorsFlow CytometryHumansImmunoblottingMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesOncogene Protein v-aktPancreatic NeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor Cross-Talksrc-Family KinasesCSK protein, humanCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseErbB ReceptorsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesOncogene Protein v-aktProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteinssrc-Family KinasesSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID20100905
PMCPMC2872953
OpenAlexW2162369060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.