Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20100741›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2010

The disposition index: adjustment for peripheral vs. hepatic insulin sensitivity?

K Faerch, C Brøns, A C Alibegovic, A Vaag

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of diabetes research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Insights into the physiology of C-peptide.Physiological research · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K FaerchSteno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 2, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark. krif@steno.dk
C Brøns
A C Alibegovic
A Vaag
Steno Diabetes Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of pancreatic beta cell function in humans is challenging because of a complex interplay between insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity and hepatic insulin extraction. Simplified, the relationship between insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity can be described by an approximate hyperbola with the product of the two variables being constant for individuals with the same degree of glucose tolerance (the disposition index). Strengths and limitations of the disposition index have been widely debated in the literature. In this review we will focus on another and until recently unrecognized dimension of the disposition index, namely the issue of adjusting insulin secretion for hepatic versus peripheral insulin sensitivity. An underlying assumption of this issue is that the liver as compared to muscle plays a different role in the regulation of in vivo insulin secretion.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationGlucoseHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceInsulin-Secreting CellsLiverMuscle, SkeletalGlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID20100741
PMCPMC2834935
OpenAlexW1516322905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.