Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20100678›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2010

Meeting report: knowledge and gaps in developing microbial criteria for inland recreational waters.

Samuel Dorevitch, Nicholas J Ashbolt, Christobel M Ferguson, Roger Fujioka, Charles D McGee, Jeffrey A Soller, Richard L Whitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  3. Enterococci in the environment.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel DorevitchUniversity of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois 60612 , USA. sdorevit@uic.edu
Nicholas J Ashbolt
Christobel M Ferguson
Roger Fujioka
Charles D McGee
Jeffrey A Soller
Richard L Whitman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has committed to issuing in 2012 new or revised criteria designed to protect the health of those who use surface waters for recreation. For this purpose, the U.S. EPA has been conducting epidemiologic studies to establish relationships between microbial measures of water quality and adverse health outcomes among swimmers. New methods for testing water quality that would provide same-day results will likely be elements of the new criteria. Although the epidemiologic studies upon which the criteria will be based were conducted at Great Lakes and marine beaches, the new water quality criteria may be extended to inland waters (IWs). Similarities and important differences between coastal waters (CWs) and IWs that should be considered when developing criteria for IWs were the focus of an expert workshop. Here, we summarize the state of knowledge and research needed to base IWs microbial criteria on sound science. Two key differences between CWs and IWs are the sources of indicator bacteria, which may modify the relationship between indicator microbes and health risk, and the relationship between indicators and pathogens, which also may vary within IWs. Monitoring using rapid molecular methods will require the standardization and simplification of analytical methods, as well as greater clarity about their interpretation. Research needs for the short term and longer term are described.

Indexed as

RecreationBacteriaBathing BeachesCell Culture TechniquesGovernment RegulationResearchUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyWater Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID20100678
PMCPMC2898866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.