Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20100350›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Copy number variation in the genomes of twelve natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Jason S Maydan, Adam Lorch, Mark L Edgley, Stephane Flibotte, Donald G Moerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CGC1, a new reference genome forGenome research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IntraspecificNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mutational and transcriptional landscape of spontaneous gene duplications and deletions inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. When natural selection gives gene function the cold shoulder.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason S MaydanDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
Adam Lorch
Mark L Edgley
Stephane Flibotte
Donald G Moerman

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variation is an important component of genetic variation in higher eukaryotes. The extent of natural copy number variation in C. elegans is unknown outside of 2 highly divergent wild isolates and the canonical N2 Bristol strain.

resultsWe have used array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to detect copy number variation in the genomes of 12 natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. Deletions relative to the canonical N2 strain are more common in these isolates than duplications, and indels are enriched in multigene families on the autosome arms. Among the strains in our study, the Hawaiian and Madeiran strains (CB4856 and JU258) carry the largest number of deletions, followed by the Vancouver strain (KR314). Overall we detected 510 different deletions affecting 1136 genes, or over 5% of the genes in the canonical N2 genome. The indels we identified had a median length of 2.7 kb. Since many deletions are found in multiple isolates, deletion loci were used as markers to derive an unrooted tree to estimate genetic relatedness among the strains.

conclusionCopy number variation is extensive in C. elegans, affecting over 5% of the genes in the genome. The deletions we have detected in natural isolates of C. elegans contribute significantly to the number of deletion alleles available to researchers. The relationships between strains are complex and different regions of the genome possess different genealogies due to recombination throughout the natural history of the species, which may not be apparent in studies utilizing smaller numbers of genetic markers.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HelminthAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA, HelminthINDEL MutationLinkage DisequilibriumRecombination, GeneticSequence DeletionDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID20100350
PMCPMC2822765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.